tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7481330.post3479759588554948171..comments2023-10-24T11:05:25.288-04:00Comments on Mark Rauterkus & Running Mates ponder current events: My comment at another blog threadMark Rauterkushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17157914569686528007noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7481330.post-83521996164529217812008-03-19T11:46:00.000-04:002008-03-19T11:46:00.000-04:00Wow: I think I disagree with you 'in principal'. ...Wow:<BR/> I think I disagree with you 'in principal'.<BR/> Council's and executives need to operate with the assurance of their decisions being 'legal'. <BR/> But yeah... all the leagal 'b.s.' tends to turn into a 'running the clock' billing situation.<BR/> How about just limiting the amount that could be spent on the position? (and then, adding positions for 'everyone' would still have a fixed budget amount). <BR/> It might restrain the legal b.s., but also provide assurance to elected officals.<BR/> Just my thoughtAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com