Statement to Pittsburgh Public Schools Board and Administration from Mark Rauterkus, October 24, 2011

Statement to Pittsburgh Public Schools Board and Administration from Mark Rauterkus, October 24, 2011 *

Hello Board members, Superintendent and staff. My name is Mark Rauterkus. I live in the South Side and have two children that attend Pittsburgh Public Schools.

Later in your agenda you will see a personell matter. I am very happy and excited to say that I've accepted the swim coaching position for the high school boys swimming coach at Pittsburgh Obama. I am really thrilled. It is going to be exciting to work with the kids and such. I won't let the students or you down.

One person emailed me and said the whole burden of PPS Athletic Reform Task Force, something that I was working on prior, is now falling on my shoulders. This is something that I'm willing to accept. If I have enough access and good support, and I think that will come, we will do some amazing things and hopefully we can be that model.

A lot of sports, and I don't want to get all Knute Rockne on you, is about playing well with one another. I think we need to use sports as best we can to keep the kids good goals.

It is alarming that the Schenley building is for sale for $2-million and it is a loss of a swim pool, something I care about most, but also the gym.

My suggestion to you is, if you must, sell the school building but do not sell the athletic facilities. Perhaps you can put a rider on the sale of some sort.

When the schools with grades 6 to 12 were created, you have to remember you have a middle school facility with their own middle school teams. They need to be practicing after school. Then these schools also must serve high school teams as well. They all need to be practicing after school.

Let's hold onto those athletic facilities and use them.

Even right now, with the closed Peabody facility, we have to use that, all the time. That is another access thing. It is sitting idle and we should be using it for our swim season, swim lessons, water polo, fitness.

In September I took a team of high school boys to Columbus, Ohio, for a water polo tournament. We played in the JV brackets as Pittsburgh Combined in Worthington. In the last game, at Worthington, we won in a game over Upper Arlington. I want to thank Dr. Lane for putting that news into the Superintendent's report and our players were very happy to hear her congratulations on their play. Two weeks ago I gathered 17 players from the city and a few from Shaler, and we played two games on a Saturday evening against North Allegheny's Club Teams. The kids did great. Everyone was proud, as they should be. Then they figured, "Boy, if we had practices and a legit schedule, we'd be really, really good."

Speaking of access, I'm expecting we'll work out access to Westinghouse High School so we can do afterschool programs there and build up some aquatics programs there.

Speaking of Westinghouse, it appears to me that the name, Westinghouse, the colors and the mascot is important to them. It would be best to keep the name Westinghouse as well as the colors and the mascott.

Houses in the Schenley Farms neighborhood sell for more than $2-million dollars. This is a giant building and it has a swim pool and gym. If you must, sell the school, but get a fair price. And by all means, do NOT sell the school on the cheap and then have the new owners expect to get a tax break or tax abatement into the future. I'd say "No way to that." I have always been against TIFs and tax-breaks that take money from today's students. Different people, like homeowners, need to carry more of the tax burden. Plus, a tax break for some amounts to a bribe. That is never healthy.

We could use that swim pool and gym that is within Schenley. It is new. It is of great size for a high school programs. A condition of sale could be for the new owners to occupy the school and the district to retain the sports facilities.

We have talked about this before with the creation of the schools that span from grades 6 to 12. These schools need to have VARSITY, JV, FRESHMEN and MIDDLE SCHOOL teams. The Sci-Tech and U-Prep schools were built for middle school teams. Use the sub-standard gyms and pools in those schools for sports play for middle school students and then give access to the high school students of both U-Prep and Sci Tech, an easily walk, to Schenley for their JV and Varsity teams practices and games.

Intramurals present another area where PPS needs great expansion. We need to have the space available in the evenings to do those programs. Some can be done on a city-wide basis at Pittsburgh Schenley.

It is with sports where be learn how to best play well with one another. We have heard plenty from the factions at Oliver High School and Perry High School. We need more common ground. We need sports facilities so we can have better coaching opportunities, better school spirit, better fitness and a district that is going to retain its students and families.

Our kids need high goals. So don't take away these goals, the physical hoops in the gyms, by selling the facility that is necessary for our schools to thrive.

And when the time is right, I would like to work to put in swimming and water polo programs at either Perry or Oliver High School as well.

* These were not my exact words.

Kathy Fine makes a statement about the selling of PPS school facilities

From Kathy Fine, a Pittsburgh citizen who helps with the education blog, Pure Reform.

Enough is enough.

Four years ago, the PPS administration proposed closing Schenley High School based on deceptions and out and out lies.

• They lied when they said that that would keep Schenley open after the community outcry.
·
• They lied about the level of danger due to asbestos and the urgency of removing students from the facility.
• They lied about forming a stakeholder committee to discuss possible reuses for the building.
• They lied about the cost for renovations.

And now their lies are public knowledge. The district let Schenley sit unused while they spent tens of millions of dollars on renovations on inferior buildings and instituted controversial reform experiments that we new would fail (and sadly, we have been proven right). Now they are proposing selling this historic building on invaluable city property for $2M dollars to a developer that will convert the old school into apartments for a cost of $35M dollars. That’s right, $35M dollars to gut the entire facility, remediate the asbestos, replace electrical and HVAC systems and build separate apartments. 5 years ago, the PPS administration told us that just updating the mechanicals and remediation would cost up to $81M!

The students at University Prep are worse off than they were at Schenley. They are faring no better academically, but now they are housed in an inadequate middle school facility and their sports and other extracurriculars have been decimated.

The closing of Schenley has resulted in the resegregation of our high schools and separate but unequal facilities and programming for the minority students in the East End of our city. While the predominantly white high schools like Brashear, Carrick and Alderdice have remained untouched, with beautiful buildings and sports facilities, the predominantly minority high schools like Obama (the new IB school), University Prep and Sci-Tech are squeezed into middle school facilities or facilities with no windows or natural light and have been forced to give up any real sports programming.

And the proposed Reizenstein sale also raises concerns. The county has assessed this property at over $22M, but the bidder the district is putting forward is offering only $5.4M Moreover, this flat, conveniently located property with some of the best PPS parking in the East End is the go to spot for district wide meetings. It is also the site of a popular pre-school program. DeJong, the facility consultant, recommended keeping the property, reportedly so that it would be available at a future time when the district wishes to build a new modern facility.

PLEASE, come to the public hearing at 6PM on Monday, 10/24 and tell our school board that we cannot see our district dismantled piece by piece. Call 412-622-3600 and sign up to speak by 12N on Monday. Or just come to lend support! Some talking points:

• End the separate but unequal treatment of the minority students in the East End.
• The lack of accountability regarding the deception about the true cost of renovation
• The failures of the reforms that took place at the cost of Schenley High School
• University Prep is a failed experiment
• Sci-Tech’s building is too small to accommodate all of the students that want to attend
• Sharing sports facilities between middle and high school has resulted in tremendous scheduling difficulties, with some students having to wait until evening for practice.

The Schenley building and sports facilities are worth much more than $2M. There has been talk of building a gymnasium for University Prep at a cost of $8M. We could use the Schenley sports facilities for University Prep, Obama and Sci Tech and save $6M, while providing these three schools with a centralized location for their sports programming.

Stop the fire sale of Reizenstein and Schenley.

The TIME IS NOW to stop this charade of “reform” and put a halt to the sale of our precious public school resources for a pittance.

Kathy Fine
Pure Reform

Fw: cc letter waste/ mismanagement

Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®

---

From: Asw122@aol.com

Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:59:15 -0400 (EDT)

To: <mark.rauterkus@gmail.com>

Subject: cc letter waste/ mismanagement

October 19, 2011

 

Mr. Ron Tomalis, Secretary of Education

Pennsylvania Department of Education

333 Market Street

Harrisburg, PA 17126-0333

 

Dear Mr. Tomalis:

 

I am writing with a concern about possible waste and mismanagement of Pittsburgh Public School assets.

 

As you may know, in June 2008 the PPS Board voted 5-4, despite strong opposition, to close Schenley High School.  The reason given was the presence of asbestos plaster, although it was later shown that other functioning Pittsburgh public schools had similar if not identical plaster issues.  The Board mandated that a committee be formed to consider re-use of the building, including possible re-use as a school.  Over the next three years parents, community members and some Board members requested formation of this committee.  Suddenly last summer, without committee input, the district announced that the property was for sale and that the bid deadline was December 31, 2011 (a date that was recently moved up to October 13, 2011).   A bid for $2M, which the district appears likely to accept very soon, was revealed this week.

 

HOWEVER, the Schenley athletic addition (including gym and pool) does not have asbestos plaster problems.   It was added in 1987 at a cost of $9.4M (about $18M in current dollars).  Similar recent projects in neighboring districts have cost $20M - $25M.  Even looking at just the athletic facilities, PPS will be handing off an extremely valuable asset for a pittance.  Minimal marketing took place, and it is quite likely that other potential purchasers did not know the building was for sale or that the gymnasium and pool do not have plaster problems.

 

More importantly, our Pittsburgh public school students could benefit greatly from this athletic facility.  Schenley was replaced by three 6-12 schools which in some cases lack facilitiesappropriate for a high school, such as regulation sized pools.   In addition, the high school level students must wait to use facilities until the middle school day is over, and then must work practices and meets around middle school practices and meets.  Because schools are small, joint teams are necessary and students  must travel between locations.  The Schenley athletic facilities are in a central location (Oakland) and would 1) greatly alleviate the overscheduling and inequity created by the 6-12 configuration and 2) provide a single location for the joint teams (which include charter school students) to practice and play.  And, because other Oakland organizations are in need of pool and gym time, there are real revenue opportunities that could well offset the cost of maintaining the building, even if the classroom portion just sat in reserve.  

 

An additional concern is that the district put the cost of making Schenley available for continued use as a school at $81M, while the bidder for the property indicates that it will manage to convert it to an entirely new use (residential) for only $35M.  I urge the Pennsylvania Department of Education without delay to investigate this discrepancy as well as the issues surrounding the athletic facilities and to ensure that our properties are being handled in a manner that is  fiscally responsible and equitable to all students.

 

Annette S. Werner (asw122@aol.com)

 

cc:  Auditor General Jack Wagner

Schenley Winter Sports

Both the girls and boys are in the city league basketball playoffs. The boys' quarterfinal game was postponed from yesterday because of the snow. They will be playing this evening at Schenley. Due to the size of Schenley's gym, it is quite possible that the game will sell out.

The girls' team will be playing tomorrow, Thursday, at 6:30 PM at Allderdice High School against Perry, the third place finisher. The girls could really use your support as they battle for a place in the finals and the Allderdice gym can hold a lot of fans. The girls have had some really impressive wins with balanced scoring and a lot of exciting moves.

Also at Allderdice, at 3 PM is the final regular swim meet of the season. Allderdice, once again, has a very strong team but the Schenley swimmers do have a chance to beat them, or at least make for some very exciting races.

amy moore

Streakin'

Schenley hasn't lost a City League game in four years. The Spartans also haven't lost a City League championship since 2004, when they fell to Perry. The streak started when Pitt center DeJuan Blair returned from a knee injury and played his first season at Schenley as a sophomore. The Spartans, who are led by Deandre Kane and Greg Blair these days, will look to continue their dominance tonight when they take on Langley in the semifinals at home.

The boys City League championship will be held at 5 p.m. on Feb. 21, and the girls title game will be played at 7 p.m. Both games will be played at the A.J. Palumbo Center.

High School Highlights: Schenley's streak hits 69

High School Highlights: Schenley's streak hits 69:

This gives another good reason why the Pittsburgh City League needs to be eliminated.

In swimming, there are no teams at Oliver and Westinghouse and Perry.

CAPA has NO SPORTS.

It is not any fun to go through years of play with league opponents and always win.

Let's raise some standards. Let's get the city kids playing in the WPIAL on a day to day basis.

Let's have a city league tournament, or tip-off classic, or all-star post-season match. The city teams would still play against each other from time to time. But, the city league squads need to have 'competition' that makes sense.

Schenley and Schools update from Amy M

Two emails, from the past two days, edited ever so slightly.

Great news, we hope, that a tentative agreement has been reached between the board and the teachers' union. Let us hope that both sides will ratify the agreement. It was a very positive sign that they continued to meet until they came to an agreement. The school district could not afford to have a strike on top of all the other problems that it is facing -- declining enrollments, low test scores, controversy over new programs and closed school, etc., etc. etc.

Schenley PSCC meeting this evening (1-16) in the library at 6 pm. Focus is Math/PSE.

I never sent the promised follow-up on our meeting at Panera on Sunday. Nine of us gathered to exchange ideas and report on separate committees that have been meeting. At this time, we are aware of 3 separate committees that are working on various aspects of the Schenley/Frick/IB World situation.

Building/fundraising--There is an active committee that is focusing solely on retaining the Schenley building as a school. It has two offshoots: fundraising/grant writing and engineering. Although they are not ready to give a report to us yet, the group is actively working to save the building. Additional information will be released at a later date.

Alternative Options-- This group has formulated questions about high school reform plans and their implementation and met twice with Mr. Lopez. They continue to push for answers to some questions that haven't been fully answered yet, to gather as much information as possible about what changes are being planned, and to push for more parent and community input at the beginning of these processes rather than tacked on the end. Jen Lakin is in this group, if you would like to send her suggestions for questions to be included.

IB World Steering Committee -- Andie Karsh is representing the parents on this committee that is meeting with Cate Reed (and others) from the High School Reform Task Force. It also includes teachers from the IB program among its members. They have discussed among other topics how the 9th graders will be housed at Frick. The next meeting which is being held in the morning when Andie cannot attend is to focus on recruitment for the IB program.

8th grade parents-- Although not yet an official committee, parents of 8th graders who are considering the IB program are trying to organize their own set of questions and concerns in regard to the immediate future of the IB program. The future freshman class will have a huge effect on the future of the IB program. There are many problems that need to be worked out if our 9th graders are going to be housed in a separate building. Parents and students need to be HEARD.

After hearing the "reports" from the different committees, we tried to get some talking points for the Jan 14 board hearing. Barbara Brewton has given me permission to reprint parts of her speech to the board (see below) because those of us who were there Monday night thought that she did an excellent job of disseminating our thoughts.

Monday board hearing; 31 scheduled speakers, but 4 or 5 did not speak. About 11 spoke about the CAPA/Rogers merger detailing the lack of space, etc. Their comments reinforced the Schenley message "Don't change a program that is a huge success" without clearing thinking of the consequences of your actions. Several others spoke about changes to the Miller program or about reform in general. Thanks to the 5 speakers from Schenley who again tried to get the board to slow down. Mr. Roosevelt and 3 board members were not at the hearing because of contract negotiations that were going on at the same time. Although they missed some very good speeches, the results of their meeting certainly was worth the missing of the hearing.

Barbara Brewton's speech:

I speak tonight as a parent of a Schenley High School student and a concerned resident of Pittsburgh. I would like to first and foremost than you, the Board, for requesting the recent informational meetings on plans for high school reform to help you make the best decisions on this very important issue. I can't imagine how difficult it must be to process all this information, to gather input from your constituents and to make such weighty decisions. I respect your position and would like to offer comments that I hope will be useful concerning the decision-making process.

Please involve parents. Find the common themes that emerge in response to plans for high school reform and address them before moving forward. Ask the administration for a detailed, comprehensive plan that outlines what the District's high schools will look like in 5 and 10 years. What is the nature of the commitments, such as that with Pitt's School of Education that is necessary to make these plans successful? Are the plans equitable across neighborhoods and socioeconomic lines? Do they respect what is good about Pittsburgh--innovation undergirded by tradition and people who are passionate about doing what is best for their children and their communities?

Finally, I respectfully urge you, the Board, to postpone any major decision or expenditures of resources until these questions are explicitly and carefully answered. There is too much at stake. Once sold, Schenley High School would be gorever gone. School communities, once dismantled, would unlikely ever come back. I fear that this is precisely the goal of current plans for high school reform. But I believe that this school district can acheve even greater progress toward sweeping and equitable academic improvement by harnessing the energy and resources of all the stakeholders.

For me, there has been a silver lining surrounding the possible closure of Schenley. My quiet, 16-year old daughter, Anna, has found her voice. She has spoken here, rallied outside the building and attended meetings where she is the only student. Anna, like many other students who are engaged on this issue, is "Being the Change" that we want our children to be in their world. While she is bitterly disappointed about moving to Reizenstein her senior year, she wanted me to convey that it would be a move she could more readily accept if she knew that Schenley would re-open after the necessary renovations take place. As her parent, I have very serious concerns about the transition plans for next year, ranging from student and teacher morale to extracurricular activities to fractured student spirit by placing 9th graders in a different building. But, like my daughter, I believe that it is a sacrifice worth making if Schenley is preserved.

I know that this has been a long email but I wanted to catch everyone up on what has been happening behind the scenes. If you have anything to share with the group, I will pass it on. IF you wish to be removed from this list, please let me know.

amy moore

---

Today's note:

The topics for last evenings PSCC were special education and math. Ms. deChicchis gave a brief overview of the PSE at Schenley. Approximately 130 students come under the special ed department ranging from students with learning disabilities that need accommodations to a small group of students receiving life skills in a self-contained classroom. Students are prepared for advanced education or for entering the work force.

Math--Mr. Fitzioris gave an impromptu discussion of the math program which at the high school level is probably the most difficult subject to discuss because of the different options. For mainstream or PSP who did not have algebra in 8th grade, the sequence is Alg I, Geometry, Alg II and Elem Functions. Beginning next year, any student who has not scored at least proficient on the PSSA will take an additional math class. CAS students and those who had algebra in 8th will take Geometry, Alg II, Elementary Functions, and Calculus. Advance math students who had geo in 8th grade have the option of taking AP statistics or registering for a college math class as a senior. To further confuse the picture, Unified Math had previously been taught but is being phased out. For students graduating in 2009 and after, 4 credits in math are required. Students (and parents) should contact the student's counselor if there are any questions regarding the sequence of classes or possible substitutions.

Upcoming Dates--Financial Aid including the Pittsburgh Promise is scheduled for next Wednesday, January 23 from 6-8 pm in the Schenley Library. If you have a senior planning to attend any post-secondary school, you should plan to attend this session to hear what needs to be done to apply for the Pittsburgh Promise money. Parents of juniors should also attend to start planning for next year; this new money that is available from the city could alter your plans.

Feb. 11--program on NEED scholarship. Additional information will be sent as I receive it.

Feb. 20--the next PSCC meeting will be on High School Reform

April-- a meeting will be held with the parents of current 10th graders to discuss the IB program.

---

update 3:

Financial Aid Nights at Schenley High School are slated for January 23, 2008, from 6-8 pm in the Library. Another is February 11, 2008, from 6-8 pm in the library. Mr. Ed Jones will also be in attendance to talk about the Pittsburgh Promise.

Parents of eighth graders were trying to get together to share information about the upcoming changes. If you want to become involved or would like additional information, contact Jen Lakin. Get her email from the blog owner (Mark @ Rauterkus . com) or peek into the comments of this posting.