Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
|
Americans For a Free Republic | P.O. Box 801213 | Dallas | TX | 75380 |
As fit citizens, neighbors and running mates, we are tyranny fighters, water-game professionals, WPIAL and PIAA bound, wiki instigators, sports fans, liberty lovers, world travelers, non-credentialed Olympic photographers, UU netizens, church goers, open source boosters, school advocates, South Siders, retired and not, swim coaches, water polo players, ex-publishers and polar bear swimmers, N@.
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
|
Americans For a Free Republic | P.O. Box 801213 | Dallas | TX | 75380 |
Nelson Hultberg on the Power of the Market, 3rd-Party Success and his New Book: "Nelson Hultberg on the Power of the Market, 3rd-Party Success and his New Book"
Education Week: Why Did the Gates Small-High-Schools Program Fail?: "Elliot Washor has explained how small, personalized high schools work. The following conditions are necessary, he writes, if we want “all youth to experience productive learning”:"
Education Week: Why Did the Gates Small-High-Schools Program Fail?: "Elliot Washor has explained how small, personalized high schools work. The following conditions are necessary, he writes, if we want “all youth to experience productive learning”:"
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
Good morning. Let me begin my argument by reading Article I Section 1 of the Pennsylvania constitution:All men are born equally free and independent, and have certain inherent and indefeasible rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting property and reputation, and of pursuing their own happiness.I want to underscore that this is Article I, Section 1 of our state constitution. Not Article V. Not section 23. It's Article I Section 1. There's a distinct reason why our right to acquire, possess and protect property is one of the very first among many inherent rights listed in the Declaration of Rights. And let's be clear - these rights are declared. Nobody was asking permission for the right to acquire, possess and protect property. The framers declared these property rights, using this exact wording from the very beginning in 1776. The reason that property rights are listed at the beginning of the Declaration of Rights is because the people who founded this commonwealth and created our frame of government clearly understood that private property is the cornerstone of a free society. Without property, there is no freedom. Without property, none of our other inherent rights make much of a difference. But don't take my word for it. Section 124 of John Locke's Second Treatise of Government, written in 1690 and pre-dating the Pennsylvania Constitution by nearly a century, states: The great and chief end… of men's uniting into commonwealths, and putting themselves under government, is the preservation of their property.With the importance of our right to acquire, possess and protect property firmly in mind, let me read some highlights of a letter recently written by a deputy sheriff to David Baldinger of the Pennsylvania Taxpayers Cyber Coalition: Imagine having someone knock on your door as late as 10:00 P.M. You answer the door and are faced with two or more Deputy Sheriffs in full uniform with a marked sheriff's car outside. The local police may also be on hand in the event of a problem. The neighbors may be watching. One of the deputies presents you with a court order stating that you are being evicted from your home due to unpaid property taxes.Now if the chief reason for creating government is to preserve our property, how is it that agents of that very same government are assigned the task of taking our property from us? To me, this is an indication that somewhere along the line, the tables have turned. We are no longer treated as free individuals with inherent rights, but as subservient subjects begging for privileges. This ultimate obliteration of our inherent right to acquire, possess and protect property is enough reason alone to eliminate property taxes in Pennsylvania. But if we need more ammunition, then all we need to do is examine the way that tax is assessed. I don't believe there's a single person in this room who could argue with a straight face that property tax assessments in Pennsylvania are uniform or fair. Uniformity, it should be noted, is required for all methods of taxation by Article 8 Section 1 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Even when this unfairness is officially recognized, as it was by a Lebanon County judge who recently ordered the county to reassess all properties by 2012, the so-called solution guarantees no more uniformity or fairness than the problem. Ask anyone who knows - the result of any reassessment process is that one-third of the properties will be given a fair assessment, while the remaining two-thirds will be assessed either too high or too low. | And don't forget the cost of assessing properties for the purpose of taxation. It's estimated that the upcoming process in Lebanon County will cost as much as 3 million dollars, or about 55 dollars for each parcel of property in the county. Is a final report that's 67 percent wrong really worth 3 million dollars of our hard-earned money? No other form of taxation carries such a high cost just to determine what the taxable base is. But let's not place blame for this problem with those who aren't at fault. Although school directors, county commissioners, city council members and township officials have no incentive whatsoever to make sure that property taxes are uniform or fair, they are only trying to do the best they can with the tools they have. For the most part, these local officials are prohibited from using other methods of taxation to raise revenue. The finger of blame should be pointed squarely at Harrisburg, as the property tax problem is a statewide problem and can only be addressed by statewide action. For more than four decades, efforts have been made in Harrisburg to ease our property tax burden. Various revenue replacement and/or rebate schemes have been suggested and tried, but all have failed to satisfactorily solve the problem. Certainly, none have even come close to putting government in the position of unquestionably reestablishing our right to acquire, possess and protect property. If we really want to eliminate property taxes once and for all in Pennsylvania, the only proper way to do it is with a constitutional amendment. If we choose instead to use statutory law, there is nothing to prevent the General Assembly from reversing that law and reinstating property taxes. And as we witnessed with the Supreme Court's ruling on the slots law in 2005, such a reversal could occur without any debate or notice whatsoever. A constitutional amendment, on the other hand, would require a vote of the people to overturn. To be successful, such an amendment should include three key features. First and foremost, a constitutional amendment to eliminate property taxes must not be dependent upon any particular revenue replacement scheme. Usually when I speak on this subject, the most common question I hear is 'how do you propose to replace the revenue?' The correct answer - and I don't mean to be flippant at all - is 'I don't care.' No matter what revenue replacement scheme we end up with, it is sure to be more uniform, fair and less expensive than property taxes. But we cannot continue to allow various special interests to divide and conquer us based on the method of revenue replacement. In fact, doing so is like putting the cart before the horse. For this reason, the second key feature of any constitutional amendment to eliminate property taxes is a set period of time - I propose up to five years - for the General Assembly to address the revenue issue. During this time, our well-compensated best and brightest in Harrisburg can engage in great debate with the understanding that they absolutely, positively must come up with an answer, because we the people have given them a firm deadline. The third key feature of such an amendment is a protection against any taxing authority taking unfair advantage of taxpayers during the interim period. With these things in mind, the wording for such a constitutional amendment could be relatively simple, as follows if one were adopted today: Taxation, assessment or valuation of real property by any taxing authority or jurisdiction within the Commonwealth shall be prohibited after June 30, 2014. Until that time, no taxing authority or jurisdiction shall increase property tax rates, assessments or revenues by an amount greater than a localized combination of inflation and population growth.To sum up my argument, property taxes must be eliminated in Pennsylvania in order to protect our inherent and declared right to acquire, possess and protect property, the cornerstone of a free society. It is imperative that we accomplish this with a constitutional amendment that is independent of any particular revenue replacement scheme and sets a firm deadline for the General Assembly to react. |
Uptown Partners is hosting a community festival in Uptown on Saturday, August 28, 2010. It will be similar to last year's "Pop-Up Pittsburgh: Uptown on the Move."
Share your ideas about entertainment, food, and other features to make this event a success with the Festival Committee. It is meeting at 6:30 pm on Wednesday, February 24, at Uptown Partners office, 710 Fifth Ave, Suite 1000.
This meeting will be the first of a series of monthly Festival Committee meetings. Join for one or all of the meetings!
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
What the Vancouver Olympic Games mean to Canada - Michael Farber - SI.com: "Canada's Olympic home losing streak began July 18, 1976, a day after the opening ceremonies in Montreal, trudged depressingly through Calgary 1988 and now stands at 0-for-244 as an expectant nation awaits the lighting of the cauldron for the XXI Olympic Winter Games.It isn't about winning. It is about showing up, the participation, the struggle, the journey, the self-discovery, the effort, the relationships.
Education Week: Attention, Gates: Here's What Makes a Great Teacher: "“In a quest to find out the best teaching practices, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is giving $45 million to six school districts, including Denver, for a two-year study of teaching.The best summary:
“The Measures of Effective Teaching project will examine the work of 3,700 teachers from across the country, using videotapes, surveys, and student assessments to figure out what works and what doesn’t.”"
Olympic protesters rally against cost, security - 2010 Olympics - SI.com: "That includes whether their late-afternoon journey through downtown Vancouver ends at peaceful protest or in tear gas and mass arrests.
'Our main goal is to be the voice of opposition, to disrupt the Games with a message of resistance and the true social impacts,' said Anna Hunter, an organizer with the Olympic Resistance Network, a consortium of groups behind a 'Take Back Our City' march planned for Friday. The protesters are railing against everything from the cost of the Olympics to tight security. 'The ORN believes in a diversity of tactics and strategies.'
CMU's Priya Narasimhan "loves this city." She worked with CMU students and created the "smart football " http://www.footballtracking.org/ and other kwel gizmos, http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/01/students-using/.
This week they put up a snow status site after pulling two all-nighters.
Go to the site, http://www.cityzenmobile.net, to
report road conditions and snow removal progress. Priya invites all to take a look and add your insights.
Olympics: Locals just miss in luge, snowboard: "Robby Huerbin of Ross Township was among USA Luge's top competitors through 2009, including a victory in his final qualifying run Nov. 6 in Park City, Utah, but a cumulative points system kept him off the team. And he knew it that day.
Lynn Ott of Sewickley was in similar position with U.S. Snowboarding, but her final event Nov. 13 in Copper, Colo., was beset with misfortune, and she was finished.
Specter wins Pa. party backing | Philadelphia Inquirer | 02/07/2010: "Wagner, who had been meeting party leaders among the back roads and veterans halls of Pennsylvania for months, received the majority of votes with 153 on the second and final ballot to 76 for his closest rival, Allegheny County Executive Dan Onorato. Wagner won more than two-thirds of the 67 counties, dominating the smaller ones, but the county-by-county votes were weighted according to Democratic criteria.My early favorite in the race for Gov and Lt. Gov is on the R side, Russ Diamond. He is running for Lt. Governor.
Wagner called it a victory.
'I'm obviously very proud of the support,' he said. 'The majority of votes - over 50 percent - that is a strong vote total, in my opinion.'
Onorato, who saw in advance that he couldn't win, claimed a victory in preventing Wagner from winning.
'This is a big boost for us today. This is a big win for us,' he said. 'The state committee has made it clear they're not going to endorse anybody. It's wide open for me.'
Onorato said that with his huge advantage in campaign money - nearly 10 times what any other Democrat had Dec. 31 - he was in the strongest position to win in May.
Wagner and Onorato are both Pittsburghers. Their home county was split, with 26 votes for Onorato and 15 for Wagner. In other southwestern counties, Wagner more than made up the difference.
Specter wins Pa. party backing | Philadelphia Inquirer | 02/07/2010: "When U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter switched from a Republican to a Democrat last year, some Democratic loyalists in Pennsylvania said hell would freeze over before they'd embrace an old foe they had been battling in statewide elections for 30 years.Fine time to become a Libertarian.
Yesterday, amid the deep freeze and howling winds of the worst winter storm in years, the Democratic State Committee met in a snowbound hotel in Amish country to consider endorsements in this year's races for the U.S. Senate, governor, and lieutenant governor.
Despite the reservations of some party members, who challenged him for what they considered pro-Republican sins of the past, Specter, of Philadelphia, beat U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak, of Delaware County, gaining the two-thirds majority required for endorsement by the party rules.
Hi 48 Hour Filmmakers and Fans! The 48 Hour Film Project returns to Pittsburgh in 2010! We'll be soon with the most exciting 48 filmmaking hours of your life! Keep an eye out here for official dates and the start of registration. In the meantime, we have a lot of cool things coming up. Including, a chance to: 1. Vote your least favorite genre "Off the Island!" 2. Make a 48HFP Music Video - no time limit! 3. Attend our end of the year extravaganza - Filmapalooza in Vegas! YOUR VOTE COUNTS! Take this short, and I mean really short survey, to help us decide the official genres this year. Tell us which to keep and which to get rid of in 2010. (A note to you lovers and haters of our beloved "Musical/Western"... it's not going anywhere, so vote for something else to get rid of or keep.) This is also your chance to make suggestions for the required Character/Prop/Line of Dialogue for cities throughout the world, so put those thinking caps on! Go here to take the survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/48HFP_genres_elements2010 MAKE A MUSIC VIDEO! That's right... here's your chance to take a little more time to make your masterpiece 48HFP film. Make a Music Video to "You Have 48 Hours" by Bill Briare. We invite you to make a music video -- in whole or in part -- and we'll mix the submissions together for the best music video ever and post it on our website and on YouTube. The deadline for submissions is February 28th, so don't miss out. For more info, go to: http://www.48hourfilm.com/competitions/musicvideo/ ATTEND FILMAPALOOZA in VEGAS! We'll be in Vegas to celebrate the fantastic 48HFP filmmaking of 2009 and we hope you'll join us. Filmapalooza is April 10-12 at the NAB Show. We'll screen all the 2009 City Winning Films, the winning Showdown and National Film Challenge films, network with filmmakers from around the world and party like it's 2010. Registration for Filmapalooza is only $25... AND it includes access to the NAB Show Floor for free! Go here to register: http://www.filmapalooza.org We hope you'll take part in one or all of the above! --Kahmeela and Nina Kahmeela Adams Nina Gibbs 48 Hour Film Project http://www.48hourfilm.com |