Kraus seeks audit on delayed Pittsburgh anti-gang program: "Kraus seeks audit on delayed Pittsburgh anti-gang program"Finally!
Grand jury accuses state Sen. Jane Orie: "Grand jury accuses state Sen. Jane OrieMy adivce to Jane Orie: Resign from public office and move to the private sector. Then spend what you must ot fight the charges so you don't go to jail for too long of a stay.
Says Republican state senator misused office, staff
The results are in! This Wednesday, April 7, at 5:30 PM, the auditor who conducted the Title IX audit of the Pittsburgh Public Schools' high school athletics programs will present her findings and recommendations to the board's Education Committee members. After her presentation, the school district will present their plan for implementing her recommendations and ensuring gender equity in their sports programs.
History of the Title IX Audit
This audit was undertaken by PPS after the Women's Law Project met with school board members and counsel to advocate on behalf of female athletes in the school district. At that meeting, the WLP also discussed preliminary findings from Right to Know requests of several PPS high schools, which indicated that girls were not receiving equitable athletic opportunities in their school athletics programs.
Title IX Audit, Recommendations, and Implementation
At this Wednesday's Education Committee meeting, the athletic director and consultant who conducted the audit, Peg Pennepacker, will present her findings. After her presentation, the school district will reveal their plan to implement her recommendations throughout the district.
This meeting is open to the public. We hope you will join us to hear the results of this important audit and hold the school district accountable for providing equal athletic opportunities to all students, regardless of sex.
Education Committee Meeting Details
Where: Board Committee Room, Administration Building, 341 S. Bellefield Avenue (Oakland)
When: 5:30 PM
For further information: Contact the WLP at infopitt@womenslawproject.org
Police asked to look at questionable petitions The Allegheny County Elections Division has referred to police questions about ballot petitions circulated on behalf of state Rep. Jake Wheatley.This is why we need "NONE OF THE ABOVE" as an option on every ballot in the city and county -- if not the state too.
The referral by Elections Division Manager Mark Wolosik comes after Democratic primary challenger Tonya Payne alleged forgeries on petitions circulated for Mr. Wheatley by city Councilman R. Daniel Lavelle, of the Hill District.
Ms. Payne wrote to Mr. Wolosik calling for an investigation, as did Carla Duncan, a Hill District resident whose name appears on the petitions, and who said she never signed them. The Post-Gazette contacted several other people whose names appeared on the petitions, and some of them, too, claimed they had not signed.
'We referred it to the county police,' said Mr. Wolosik, who has no investigators on his staff. Neither police nor Mr. Wheatley could be immediately reached for comment.
Parking wars - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review:If Pittsburgh sells its parking system as Ravenstahl has proposed, you can forget about free parking on Sundays or after hours, since any profit-making entity will maximize its revenue from our garages, lots and street meters. It will be a 24/7 operation that will ignore the interests of residents and local and central business districts in the name of profit.
What you don't want to do is create a situation where it's too expensive for people to park. You can actually price people out of coming into the city," Hairston says.When it is too expensive to park, the people are priced out of their cars -- and put into mass transit. They might not be taken out of the city -- but just out of their car as a way to get to the city. People can walk, bike, bus, or not come if parking is too expensive.
Behind Ravenstahl's pitch to sell off this valuable asset is his misguided desire to keep the commonwealth from taking over Pittsburgh's defunct pension fund.Wrong.
And the pension fund is something that he wants to keep so as not to lose all the pinstripe patronage that comes with the appointment of bankers and lawyers to service that fund. Those pinstripers, in turn, contribute heavily to the campaigns of those who feather their nests.
It is really that simple, since previous city administrations would have thrown a party for the Legislature if it had offered to take over the city's pension fund. By turning his back on good management, such as cutting and consolidating and downsizing, Ravenstahl has had to follow one bad decision with another: keep the pension fund and propose a divisive tuition tax or keep the pension fund and sell the parking facilities.Selling the parking facilities puts an end to the folly. To lease them, as is the real plan, only sustains the folly into the future for generations to come.
Tax-exempt garages and lots will suddenly become taxable and parkers will be required to absorb the taxes on facilities that they have already paid to construct. And the ability of government to use the development of a parking facility to spark neighborhood development or partner with a library or community center to make those projects affordable will be gone forever.Why in the world do we want to pay more taxes on our homes and less taxes or no taxes on land that is devoted to a surface parking lot. Foolishness in this article is HUGE.
As for the $200 million Ravenstahl hopes to raise, Chicago provides a cautionary note there as well. The Chicago inspector general said that the 75-year lease of parking facilities there, which netted $1.15 billion, was a lousy deal for the city since Chicago could have netted at least $2.13 billion by keeping and operating the parking over that same term.So what. The job of city governement is to protect the freedom of its citizens, operate the courts, curb mass outbreaks of disease, maintain the roads.
And the stakes could not be higher.BS again.
Post-Gazette.com South Africa's white supremacist leader Eugene Terreblanche was bludgeoned to death by two of his farm workers Saturday in an apparent dispute over wages, police said, amid growing racial tensions in the once white-led country.
Terreblanche, 69, was leader of the Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging movement, better known as the AWB, that wanted to create three all-white republics within South Africa in which blacks would be allowed only as guest workers.
The opposition Democratic Alliance party blamed increasing racial tensions for the killing.
Leonard Pitts Jr.: Den of anonymity: "It must have seemed like a great idea at the time.There is a big crock of crap in the den of the watch dog. No joke.
There was this new medium, the Internet, and newspapers were posting stories on it, and someone decided to create a forum where readers could discuss and debate what they just read. It must have seemed an inspiration kissed by the spirit of Jefferson: a free public space where each of us could have his or her say.
 | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | |||||||||||
| | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Q: Is the application form on the PPS website?
A: No, it is not on the website right now, but it will be posted when it is released.
Q: Is there a deadline for applications?
A: Yes, but it has not been determined. It depends on the release of the application. Groups will have approximately 3 weeks to complete the application.
Q: Is there an application for each site or each agency?
A: There is an application for each agency, but the agency will need to indicate all the sites.
Q: Where is the SPARC database?
A: http://www.swpaafterschool.org/
Q: What about programs that serve PPS students in the same group at non-PPS students?
A: If the program is serving PPS students, the organization should apply.
APPLICATION PROCESS
Q: How long will the partnership last?
A: The partnership will be one year – approximately August 2010 to July 2011.
Q: Are you trying to create a shopping list of programs?
A: PPS is creating a "shopping list of programs" that are willing to go to any school in the city for principals to select from (examples could include groups like Girls Scouts and Boy Scouts), but programs that are neighborhood based or work with one school will not be included in the "shopping list."
Q: How many groups do you see applying?
A: Turn out at the meetings has been very high. There are between 45-50 organizations that operate in PPS building that are required to apply and there are about 150+ off-site organizations that could apply as well.
Q: Is this only for organizations providing services in schools?
A: No, it includes organizations that operate off-site as well.
Q: If I have a new program that wants to target specific schools or students, should I apply?
A: Yes. If you expect the program to launch in School Year 2010-11, you should apply even if it doesn't start at the beginning of the school year.
Q: Do we need to provide after school programs daily to be partner?
A: No.
Q: Can the MOU process include a letter of support from the Superintendent for organizations that receive EITC funding?
A: This is something that PPS will look into.
Q: What could cause a group to be declined?
A: There is a rubric and applications will be evaluated based on the rubric. Specific examples could be groups that do not do clearances for staff; groups that do not have annual audits, groups that do not evaluate their program with rigor or groups that do not use curricula.
Q: What about programs that do not provide direct service, but that partner with organizations?
A: This is an important issue and there will be another meeting with these "non-traditional" after school programs think through how the application process applies to them.
Q: Can we partner with another organization?
A: Yes, but details on who would be the approved provider will need to be discussed further.
Q: Can you differentiate how this is different from what we are already doing?
A: We want to formalize the partnerships with after school programs through an MOU. Currently there are some programs have MOU's based on funding (i.e. SES or 21st Century), some have building permits and PPS wants to incorporate the entire agency. Also, groups that don't receive funding from SES or 21st Century do not have a way of officially partnering with PPS.
FUNDING
Q: Will there be funds to support this initiative?
A: No, not initially. This is a non-monetary partnership.
RELATIONSHIP WITH SCHOOLS & PARENTS
Q: Will principals be the group to approve the programs?
A: No. The applications will be reviewed by an internal team and then will be matched with the schools where the principals indicate that they want the program and/or a service (e.g. an arts program).
Q: Does this benefit after school programs for elementary aged students in any specific ways?
A: This is targeted for students attending after school programs at all grade levels. One of the goals of this process is to make sure that more students, including elementary aged students, have more after school opportunities.
Q: What if the principal says "no" to a program?
A: The principals will be able to decide what programs they want to operate in their school buildings. There are a lot of factors that a principal will consider such as the needs of the student population, transportation, number of PPS programs such as sports, EAP and school clubs. By having a "menu" of programs willing to operate in any school for principals to select from, PPS is hopeful that the matching process will ensure that programs are located in schools with supportive principals.
Q: Will this process help with the buy-in from principals?
A: Yes. There are a lot of principals that want additional after school resources for their schools and this will definitely help. As for an overall understanding about the importance of after school, it will be a lot easier to talk about after school and its importance when we have numbers of students enrolled, opportunities available, needs to fill, etc.
Q: Are you embracing the teachers in this process?
A: Teachers are very important, but at this stage we are working with principals and counselors, as we want teachers to focus on classroom instruction and their other obligations through the end of the school year. Teachers will be a part of this process over the long term.
Q: What type of initiatives are planned to reach parents?
A: There are a lot of plans to reach parents with this information. The "menu" of options will be available on the PPS website on the community resources link for each school. It will also be a part of the community resources guide. Mark Conner, Director of Family Engagement, has already heard the after school needs from parents and is developing a strategy to inform them about the after school options once the partnerships are in place.
Q: Is PPS addressing the issues with teachers and principals about homework?
A: Yes. PPS has a new homework policy that was approved by the Board in September 2009. The policy outlines the requirements for each grade level. PPS knows that there is a lot of work to improve homework assignments and it's a key part of the Pathways work.
CLEARANCES
Q: Which clearances are required?
A: All providers and any employees of providers who will have direct contact with children must complete three required clearances: the Act 34 (Criminal Record Check), the Act 151 (Child Abuse History), and the Act 114 of 2006 (FBI Federal Criminal History). The fees to complete the clearances are to be paid by the provider.
Q: How often will clearances need to be submitted? How long are clearances "fresh"?
A: This question has been sent to the legal department for an answer.
Q: There are two FBI clearances – DPW and Dept. of Education. Which one does PPS accept?
A: At this point PPS accepts both.
DATA COLLECTION & DATA SHARING
Q: In terms of data sharing, is there going to be a form that needs to be signed by the program or parents?
A: The parents will need to sign a FERPA form created by PPS. The organizations will be held to confidentiality standards that will be outlined in the MOU.
Q: Would there be anyway that we could have a FERPA release form that we could insert into our application, rather than a separate form?
A: No, we will need the PPS FERPA form. We will try to get it to organizations as soon as applications are approved so they can be distributed with registration information.
Q: Will assessment information be included in the data exchange, not just the scores?
A: We are still working on the details on information and format of the data-sharing. Please attend any of the data committee meetings held by APOST/United Way if you have specific ideas and needs.
Q: Will you have small working groups to help develop data sharing reports?
A: Yes. There is a question on the application that allows groups to volunteer for a committee.
Q: Will you be tracking if students are in more than one program?
A: Yes, we will have a program code for every program so that students can be matched with the program(s) they are participating in.
Q: Will parents need to fill out a FERPA Form for each program?
A: Yes.
Q: How will organizations feed data to PPS?
A: This has not been determined yet because we do not want to add a burdensome process. Until we have an IT system, everyone will need to be patient and flexible.
Q: Will there be a standard format to report attendance?
A: Yes.
Q: Will PPS require that programs submit names of participants at the beginning of the year?
A: Yes.
PATHWAYS TO THE PROMISE
Q: When does "getting ready" for college start?
A: PPS is focused on 4 primary check points for Pathways to the Promise – K, 3rd, 6th and 9th Grades. PPS is striving to create a robust "college-going" culture and needs the support of the entire community in this effort.
Q: Are the principles of Pathways to the Promise built into the application? Will there be professional development on these principles?
A: Yes, there is an opportunity in the application for groups to indicate in general terms the ways that their organization / program supports Pathways. For example, there are questions about homework and college preparation. In terms of professional development, PPS will assess the needs of the CBO's/FBO's. PPS is in the beginning stages of developing Pathways and we expect to have professional development opportunities in the future.
FUTURE PLANS
Q: Are you looking at partners with MOU's to give them training or access to software?
A: There is no doubt that a city-wide software system and / or a PPS software system for after school would have a lot of benefits. PPS is in the early stages of overhauling its IT system and there is discussion about how to incorporate sports, after school programs into the type of system that is developed. This will not happen in year 1, but it is expected soon.
Q: Will there be some dialogue around CBO's capacity? For example, they only serve X students, but with X valued added, they could increased by Y.
A: Yes, and this application process is the first step in understanding capacity.
Q: Will PPS share citywide best practices on recruiting students and serving schools?
A: Yes, this is a great idea and we will do this. There will be quarterly meetings where we can start to gather this information.
Q: Could this become a volunteer clearing house for programs?
A: Need more information, but yes, it could be a recruitment tool.
Q: Do you expect over time to help programs find where their particular program would be more impactful?
A: Yes. This is a first step in that process.
Ideas, Comments & Concerns:
▪ This seems like a great opportunity so that principals will know what is happening and what is available.
▪ All providers face the same issues – transportation, getting data, etc. – hopefully, this process will be a stepping stone to a better partnership with PPS.
▪ Providers need 3-4 weeks to complete the application.
▪ Many programs need approval from their boards to proceed. A one-pager, a copy of the application and an outline of the requirements would be enough information to approach boards.
▪ Submitting monthly attendance without providing funds will be an extra burden
▪ There are a lot of deliverables (attendance reports, meetings) and benefits are not as clear.
▪ The county requires that programs submit attendance.
▪ Let's hope this helps with transportation.
▪ Autonomy as a cultural institution with academic requirements (NOTE: at this point there are not any academic requirements)
▪ Concern that PPS is trying to make all programs into the same type of program, which has happened in Pittsburgh before, not with PPS, however. (RESPONSE: PPS is not trying to make all programs the same. PPS does want a level of quality across all partner organizations.)
▪ Some programs have relationships with schools, but need permission slips from parents, which are difficult to obtain. (RESPONSE: A lot of programs have an application that parents fill out at the beginning of the year that has blanket parent permission.)
▪ SPARC database is difficult and it doesn't allow partners to remove information that is outdated or incorrect. (RESPONSE: 3rc has made the form easier. 3rc will delete or correct any information that is outdated, but programs need to contact 3rc directly.)
▪ Once we get families engaged, there needs to be additional incentives for parent involvement.
▪ There is a need for after school "booster" groups to interface with the community. Perhaps via conference calls.
▪ PPS needs to visit programs. There is a huge variety of quality and it's a concern – especially for parents.
▪ The formal partnership gives parents confidence about programs that are approved.
▪ Career exploration and employment programs can provide valuable data to help PPS improve its goals around 11th grade PA Academic Standards for Career Education and Work
▪ We need to figure out a way to incorporate a feedback loop for students' interests beyond principals' input and decisions.
▪ There is not a plan for student voice and choice
▪ This is anther data report and multiple are already being filled out.
▪ Link approved programs in PPS parent handbooks
▪ Create an on-line survey to get input on program they want or want to learn more about.
▪ This is exciting and we are glad that after school is being addressed by PPS
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
Hi After School Providers,
As you know, the Pittsburgh Public Schools recently hosted four regional meetings with community-based and faith-based after school programs to present and to receive feedback on the proposed centralized after school partnership process starting in School Year 2010-2011. The meetings were held on March 17th at Eastminster Presbyterian Church, March 23rd at Northshore Community Alliance, March 24th at the Hill House and March 26th at Brashear Association. A special thanks to all of those organizations for hosting the meetings. Ninety-nine people from seventy-five organizations participated in these regional meetings. This was an amazing turn out and it indicates the importance of and possibilities for building a city-wide after school network for youth. Thank you for attending the meetings, as your input and feedback was extremely helpful.
A one-page overview of the process, the powerpoint presentation and a summary of the questions / ideas / issues raised are attached to this E-mail. I expect the application to be released in early April.
Please contact me if you have any further questions, ideas or concerns, 412-622-3926 or hodonnell1@pghboe.net.
I thank you for participating in the meetings and I look forward to working with you.
Best, Holly
Holly O'Donnell
After School Manager
Office of Student Services
Pittsburgh Public Schools
P: 412-622-3926
F: 412-622-3916
E: hodonnell1@pghboe.net
Posts
All Comments
