Monday, May 09, 2011

Koch files ethics, but not court, complaint against Bruce Kraus, hypocrite

Bruce Kraus fumbles, big time.
Koch files ethics, but not court, complaint: "Bruce Kraus is a hypocrite who refuses to follow his own laws. How can we trust him with the welfare of the city of Pittsburgh when he cannot follow the very laws that he wrote and is subject to? Its deceptive, hypocritical and reveals a dangerous proclivity to say one thing, do another and violate the law for his own benefit.

Mr. Koch is considering all possible avenues in an attempt to address this matter. He is filing his ethically sound financial disclosure reports to the Allegheny County Board of Elections by todays deadline."
I was there when this law was hatched. I helped it NOT occur in an earlier edition. Then I was put onto the task force to help craft the law.

Some of what I wanted did NOT make it into the law. Some did.

But with this fumble from Bruce Kraus, if it was up to me, and I speak as a member of the task force appointed to study and craft a bill for city council, I would have the guilty with a scarlet letter punishment. This means that Bruce Kraus would not get any more pay checks. He could keep his seat, but the controller would suspend his pay until he resigned. Then if he did resign, he'd be able to run again the next time. Or, he can choose to not follow the rules and serve out his term -- but not get paid anything to do so.

Furthermore, those that paid the extra money to the candidate would be on a black list and those people and firms would not be able to get any money from the city either. Once Kraus was out of office, they'd be okay to resume business with the city.

In the city, we choose to not sell property to anyone who has an outstanding property tax due to the city. That is a good policy. This punishment option I suggest is similar. The city should choose to not do business nor make city payouts to anyone that choose to break the campaign finance laws of the city.

2 Political Junkies: Campaign Shenanigans

2 Political Junkies: Campaign Shenanigans: "Campaign Shenanigans"

Doug Shields is toast.

Come Live Over Here - Moving to Pittsburgh

A woman on Linked In posted:
I will be moving closer to Pittsburgh with my son. Need neighborhood advice.

I would like to know which areas of the city is quiet, inexpensive, and low crime rate. Could anyone in the group give me advice?
A nice discussion unfolds.

Some highlights:

Ed wrote: I just moved to Pittsburgh last July. I have 2 sons that are 15 and 13.
We moved into the Avonworth School district which is a hightly rated, small Class A school in the North Hills. My kids adapted great and made good friends right away.
There are several areas to live with a wide range of home prices so I am sure you could find something either in Ohio Township, Emsworth, Ben Avon or Sewickley.
Steeler Chris Hoke and Penquins Coach Dan Blysma both have kids attending
the in the Avonworth School District. I highly recommend it!
Summary: Making friends is important, as are sporting families in the neighborhood. And my take: Sports is a way to make friends. Plus, being in a highly rated yet smaller school is prime. Avenworth is a smaller-sized WPIAL school. Avonworth is a bit larger than Our Lady of the Sacred Heart High School, and the boys at CAPA. But not as big but very near to the classifications of Pittsburgh Sci-Tech, Pgh Oliver, Pgh Langley or Pgh U-Prep. Avonworth High School would not be highly rated if it played sports against all the biggest teams in the WPIAL.

Another voice: Leon posted:
Like Ed above I moved in July of last year. I have a 12 & 17 yr. old. We did extensive research on schools and looked at Upper St. Clair, Mt Lebanon and Hampton. We came from Indianapolis area and chose Hampton (20 minutes north of downtown) due the schools.

What sealed the deal was the visit to Hampton. Smaller but very tight knit, excellent academics, decent sports & music. The teachers and admin staff were very open and welcoming. Based on the kid's progress this year it was a good decision.
See how "decent sports and music matter to people.

Then Lu from Monroeville posted about having 5 neighborhood pools that are volunteer run, and kids only have to swim a length to be on a team (ours gives 6 weeks of daily lessons for 45$). Most neighborhoods are attached at some point to a park; ours has a dog park and a walking trail in the woods. Lately people have been down there playing cricket. So it's an interesting place!

Right on! Swimming and international sports. See the trend yet?

Pittsburgh Public Schools has some way better than 'decent' music and sports opportunities -- but its hit or miss. And, at times, things in those realms can suck.

People are moving to the area, but not to the city so much, based upon some clearly seen opportunities to play well with others and all that sports brings to their lives. Pittsburgh needs some type of sports reform in these matters.

Friday, May 06, 2011

My political hero!

I didn't get a chance to watch the whole debate last night, but here's a condensed version with Ron Paul's answers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMmVwW8h4Ho

Parkways to display estimated travel times

Parkways to display estimated travel times: "Parkways to display estimated travel times"



So is this going to be a signal as to how many text messages one can reply to then?

I would rather see a display of available sparking spaces as one enters the South Side, or the North Shore, or the Arena area.

Or, how about a display of the minutes until the bus arrives posted at the bus stop?

Or, how about, minutes until the draw bridge lifts, ... wait. We don't have one of those. Never mind.

How about the number of minutes for the length of term of some local politicians?

Education Week: Let's Focus on Gaps in Opportunity, Not Achievement

Education Week: Let's Focus on Gaps in Opportunity, Not Achievement: "Let's Focus on Gaps in Opportunity, Not Achievement"

The opportunity gap is large when considering the opportunities of those in suburban schools and the others in the Pittsburgh Public Schools in terms of sports and athletics.

What happens in the WPIAL is not like what happens in the City League.

What happens at WPIAL schools is not like what we provide to PPS schools.

Who the he'll is this unknown Daniel Malloy?

By Daniel Malloy, Post-Gazette Washington Bureau

"Lesser known." What hole has he been living in for the past decade?

Ron Paul is a member of the US Congress. You would think a Washington based reporter would know that. And this is the third time Doctor Paul has run for the office of US President. First as a Libertarian, then as the last one standing in the last election where McCain got the nomination of the Rs.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11126/1144518-84.stm

Thursday, May 05, 2011

Sports is out of whack | Professional | NewJerseyNewsroom.com -- Your State. Your News.

Two decades later, sports is out of whack | Professional | NewJerseyNewsroom.com -- Your State. Your News.: "Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson moving as much earth as he could to try and keep the city's National Basketball Association team in team in town despite the fact that the unemployment level had hit 12 percent in his region. At the same time he was rounding up $10 million in marketing partnership for the owners of the NBA Kings, the Maloof brothers, Johnson was cutting workers at the city's police and fire departments and school administrators were trying to figure out whether they can keep sports going in Sacramento public schools."
If professional sports teams in North America had RELIGATION, then that problem in Sacramento would not happen. We need to insist that cities that want to have big league teams PLAY into those leagues by insisting that the worst of the major league teams drop down to a minor level to make room for the new arrivals. Moving a team is NOT an option. Then all are held hostage. But, building a team, from the bottom or from minors is a great option. Furthermore, those that squander a slot in the top league need to know performance matters, or else.

Wednesday, May 04, 2011

The Pittsburgh Comet hits against Bruce Kraus too

The Pittsburgh Comet: "Koch gets Kraus on Campaign Ethics Issue"

Bruce Kraus is not well suited to be in elected office in this country.

Let's get ready to rumble! 9 PM 2012 GOP debate on Thursday

Debate day moneybomb: http://www.debateday.com/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/04/gop-hopefuls-ready-rumble-2012-presidential-debate/

Debate Day MoneyBomb
When: Thursday, May 5, 2011 9:00 PM

Debate Day Money Bomb: NEW CAMPAIGN SITE http://www.ronpaul2012.com/

The first nationally televised Republican presidential debate in the 2012 election cycle will be held on May 5, 2011. Because of this, it is imperative to showcase Ron Paul as the leading frontrunner in the race. On May 5, 2011, we will hold an online money bomb in support of Ron Paul for President 2012. A money bomb is a 24-hour fundraising event aimed at dramatically increasing funds for a specific candidate. In November 2007, Ron Paul raised more than $4.2 million in a single day. In December 2007, Ron Paul raised the most money in the history of American politics in a single day, raising more than $6 million; a record that still holds strong to this very day.

Please invite your friends, and tell them that it is essential that we all donate to Ron Paul on May 5, 2011, in preparation for the first nationally televised Republican presidential debate for 2012.
The money bomb will likely be held on Ron Paul's official campaign website, which will be linked here once it is created. For now, please visit http://www.LibertyPAC.com, and consider making a donation before the official money bomb. OR you can visit http://www.debateday.com/ and pledge your donation today as well.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/04/gop-hopefuls-ready-rumble-2012-presidential-debate/

Republicans Deny They Plan to End Medicare

Recently the U.S. House of Representatives passed a measure that would drastically change the Medicare program. The measure, part of a budget authored by Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, passed with the votes of all but four Republicans and not one Democrat.

Now the Democratic Congressional Committee is running an ad in selected congressional against Republican congress members thought to be vulnerable. The ad, which portrays seniors having to work at odd jobs to pay for their medical care, includes the line, “Congressman [name] voted to end Medicare forcing seniors to pay $12,500 for private health insurance, without guaranteed coverage.”

A spokesperson for the National Republican Congressional Committee calls the ad “shameless scare tactics” on the part of Democrats. In particular, they say they are not ending Medicare, put reforming it to save it.

Who is telling the truth? It’s important for voters to understand this issue, which may dominate next year’s elections. A recent Washington Post/ABC News poll found that 78 percent of Americans are opposed to cutting Medicare. For more than 40 years American seniors have relied on Medicare for their essential, and often expensive, health care needs. For example, the deadly lung cancer mesothelioma is nearly always diagnosed in people in or approaching their Medicare years.

The Republian position was bolstered by the fact-check site PolitiFact.com, which judged the ad to be misleading.

“Yes, the Republican plan would be a huge change to the current program, and seniors would have to pay more for their health plans if it becomes law. Democrats, including President Barack Obama, have said they are strongly opposed to the plan.

“But to say the Republicans voted to end Medicare, as the ad does, is a major exaggeration. All seniors would continue to be offered coverage under the proposal, and the program’s budget would increase every year.”

The primary point of the ad was that seniors would pay more for health care under the Republican plan, and PoliFact admits this is true. But Republicans aren’t ending Medicare, just changing it.

Others argue PoliFact was bamboozled by Republican talking points and didn’t see reality. Steve Benen writes for Washington Monthly,

“Medicare is a single-payer health care system offering guaranteed benefits to seniors. The House Republican budget plan intends to do away with the existing system and replace it with something very different — a privatized voucher plan. It would still be called “Medicare,” but it wouldn’t be Medicare.

“It seems foolish to have to parse the meaning of the word “end,” but if there’s a program, and it’s replaced with a different program, proponents brought an end to the original program. That’s what the verb means.”

What about the $12,500 figure? PoliFact acknowledges that the number comes from an analysis by the Congressional budget Office. PoliFact argues that the number is misleading, however, because it includes the amount of premiums seniors already pay. “The CBO estimates beneficiaries would contribute about $6,150 in premiums in 2022 if the program isn’t changed at all. So the extra money seniors need to pay under the Republican proposal is more like $6,350.” Oh, good; the premium would only be more than doubled.

But that’s only in 2020. The Ryan plan provides for keeping increases in Medicare tied to the Gross National Product figure, which has not been rising nearly as fast as heath care cost. So the “difference” that seniors would have to pay would get bigger every year.

ATTEND ORGANIZING 2.0 by Charles Lenchner

Edited slightly:
You should attend Organizing 2.0 on May 10, 2011:

1. You work for an organization that does not use online tools except for some email and a low quality website. Join us for hands on training on relevant software, case studies on organizations in your situation, and suggestions for best next steps that even under-resourced groups can realistically take.

2. You work for an organization that pays for and uses online tools – just not very well. How can you make good use of what you are already paying for? Learn how to move from having an online presence, to using it effectively to achieve mission goals.

3. You work for an organization that uses online tools quite well – but only in specific pockets of your work. We’re bringing together experience labor and organizing professionals figuring out (together) what works best to win campaigns, serve members, and drive up individual engagement. Join us to learn – and to share your own knowledge.

Now for another question. Why are we doing this?

Our experience is that in many organizations the introduction of technology is disruptive. At various levels, from the top to the bottom, questions about what works and why are often suppressed out of ignorance, fear and uncertainty. The gap between status power and expertise often leads to situations where anyone who “knows” can’t decide, and anyone with enough power to decide almost certainly doesn’t “know” how to do online organizing. Exactly how many union presidents come with experience as digital strategists? How many new hires who are digital natives get to decide on budgets? We haven’t met ANY. And it shows. (We've got stories!)

Our solution is to organize. Our targets are the decision makers and front line staff of labor unions and community organizing groups fighting around economic justice issues. Victory for us means advancing an organizations’ effectiveness through the appropriate use of online technologies. We win when online organizers are hired with the power to implement real online organizing strategies, when the
right kind of consultants are consulted and heard, when resources are spent wisely, when risk averse institutions embrace experimentation.

It’s hard; many of us have to bite our tongues much of the time. If we were highly paid consultants we’d probably lose clients or put out a lot of creative ideas that are then ignored. We’re taking our available assets – expertise, community and autonomy – and using them as best we can. This is the one time a year where we get together to ‘tell it like it is.’

If you’re reading this and haven’t already embraced our vision, consider these questions:

* Are Organizing 2.0’s trainers coming from labor, community organizing groups and progressive political organizations?
Yes.

* Have they done this before?
Yes.

* Are important organizations endorsing and participating?
Yes.

* Is the labor movement in New York doing so well that we can afford to continue with business as usual?
NO.

http://www.organizing20.org/pgh/

Join Us for a Special Young Professionals Reception


The Heritage Foundation
Logo

You are Cordially Invited to Attend a

Reception and Discussion for Young Professionals

hosted by The Heritage Foundation,
Allegheny Institute for Public Policy and
Commonwealth Foundation for Public Policy Alternatives
featuring
Bill Beach
Director, Center for Data Analysis, The Heritage Foundation
and
Rob Bluey
Director, Center for Media and Public Policy, The Heritage Foundation
speaking on the topic of
Will Opportunity Keep Knocking?
How Government Policies Are Making It
Harder for You to Become Successful
Tuesday, May 17, 2011

6:30–9:00 p.m.          Reception
7:30 p.m.                 Remarks
Penn Brewery
800 Vinial Street
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Please RSVP by Tuesday, May 10, 2011.
Register today by clicking here.

There is no charge for this event.

Complimentary wine, drinks and hors d'oeuvres will be provided.

For more information, please contact Janine Brown.
Phone: (202) 608-1524
Fax: (202) 675-1778   
E-mail: mailto:specialevents@heritage.org?subject=Pittsburgh%20Young%20Professionals%20Event

The Heritage Foundation | 214 Massachusetts Ave. NE, Washington, D.C. 20002

Today is Day Against DRM

May 4, 2011, is the third annual international Day Against DRM!

The Day Against DRM is an opportunity to unite a wide range of projects, public interest organizations, web sites and individuals in an effort to raise public awareness to the danger of technology that requires users to give-up control of their computers or that restricts access to digital data and media. This year, individuals and groups are working together to create local actions in their communities. Actions range from protesting an unfriendly hardware vendor to handing out informative fliers at local public libraries -- or in my case, making a blog posting.

Thanks to DefectiveByDesign.org for leading this effort.

Tuesday, May 03, 2011

Save it!

$60 million Texas High School football stadium nearing completion

$60 million Texas High School football stadium nearing completion

Meanwhile, in Pittsburgh, we have a nice football stadium on the South Side, for many teams. And, it isn't at any high school.

To join the WPIAL, our city league teams would have about two home games as all the others would need to be AWAY contests. Or, we'd have to build-up a few more fields to be able to host Friday night football games.

The field at U-Prep in The Hill, the field at Carrick, and perhaps the field at Brashear are the best available to expand. Carrick's is a Citipark field. There is a hope that the Perry or Oliver team could use PNC Park, in my dreams.

This is why we do not play hockey

Monday, May 02, 2011

Wednesday May 4th: Day Against DRM just two days away

Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®

-----Original Message-----
From: "Defective by Design" <info@defectivebydesign.org>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 18:13:15
To: Mark@Rauterkus.com<Mark@Rauterkus.com>
Reply-To: reply-1-429-1198744-d4ad5b66c4dcba616ab4860b2ef2c40c877df087-Mark=Rauterkus.com@defectivebydesign.org
Subject: [DBD] Wednesday May 4th: Day Against DRM just two days away

2011 has been a bad year for DRM. Sony is using legal actions to
harass and intimidate individuals who are modifying their own PS3
systems. And libraries are being replaced by companies like Amazon and
Apple seeking to control access to books and monitor who reads what
where. We need to send a clear message: No DRM!

So, clear your schedule for a worldwide day of action against DRM. On
Wednesday, May 4th, we will be taking action to raise the stakes and
increase awareness about the threats of Digital Restrictions
Management -- in a very significant way!

Please set some time aside in your day on Wednesday to join us for
this once-a-year opportunity! We hope you'll work with us against DRM
year-round, but coordinating online and physical events on one day
amplifies all of our voices.

* Read the blog post for some ways you can get involved.

<http://www.defectivebydesign.org/2011-day-against-drm-action-ideas>

* Check out our 2011 Day Against DRM banners for your website or blog.

<http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:DefectiveByDesign/Day_Against_DRM_2011/Banners_guide>


-------------------------------
Stop email from this list, but still allow us to contact you occasionally: unsubscribe-1-429-1198744-d4ad5b66c4dcba616ab4860b2ef2c40c877df087@defectivebydesign.org.
Stop receiving all emails from DefectiveByDesign.org: optOut-1-429-1198744-d4ad5b66c4dcba616ab4860b2ef2c40c877df087@defectivebydesign.org.

DefectiveByDesign.org is a project of the Free Software Foundation -- Fifty One Franklin Street, Fifth Floor
Boston, 02110

EPLC Education Notebook - #11-14 - May 2, 2011

Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®


From: Ron Cowell <cowell@eplc.org>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 16:37:35 -0400
To: Ron Cowell<cowell@eplc.org>
Subject: EPLC Education Notebook - #11-14 - May 2, 2011

 

Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: EPLC From Website-1

 

The Education Policy and Leadership Center

         800 North Third Street, Suite 408, Harrisburg, PA  17102

     717-260-9900     -     www.eplc.org

_________________________________________________________________

 

EPLC EDUCATION NOTEBOOK

Monday, May 2, 2011

 

Content in this edition:

Pennsylvania Policymakers

-       House

-       Senate

US Department of Education

PA Bulletin

Announcements

Datebook

 

The EPLC Education Notebook (current and past editions) also is available by visiting the EPLC website at www.eplc.org/publications_wpn.shtml

 

 

PENNSYLVANIA POLICYMAKERS

 

House

 

Ø  On April 26, the House Education Committee reported the following bills which are awaiting further action by the full House:

 

  • House Bill 285 (Rep. Mark Keller, R-86) would increase the bid limits for school construction projects from $10,000 to $25,000 and the bid limits for written or telephonic quotations from $4,000 to $7,000.  It also increases the bid limits under which a school entity’s staff can perform its own work from $5,000 to $7,000.  Under HB 285, bid limitations will be adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI).  The provisions of the bill would apply to all public school entities, Thaddeus Stevens College of Technology, and the institutions of the State System of Higher Education (SSHE).  The bill was unanimously approved.

 

  • House Bill 1330 (Rep. Thomas Quigley, R-146) would expand the Educational Improvement Tax Credit (EITC) program by increasing the available tax credits to businesses donating to Scholarship Organizations (ESO), Pre-K Scholarship Organizations (PSO) and Educational Improvement Organizations (EIO).  Under HB 1330, tax credits available to businesses donating under this program would be increased from $75 million in FY 2011-2012 to $100 million in FY 2011-2012 and $200 million in FY 2012-2013.   HB 1330 would also increase the maximum household income limits from $50,000 to $60,000 from June 30, 2011 through June 30, 2012 and to $75,000 after June 30, 2012.  Beginning July 1, 2012, the Department of Community and Economic Development (DCED) would adjust the household income amounts annually based on the Consumer Price Index.  The bill was amended in Committee to set the maximum tax credit to a business firm donating to an ESO or EIO to not exceed $400,000 in FY 2011-2012 before increasing to $750,000 in FY 2012-2013.  Additionally, the amendment sets the maximum tax credit to a business firm donating to a PSO to not exceed $200,000 in FY 2011-2012 before increasing to $250,000 in FY 2012-2013. The bill was approved by a vote of 23-2. 

 

  • House Bill 1345 (Rep. John Taylor, R-177) would provide for the movement of the Safe School Advocate in school districts of the first class (School District of Philadelphia) from the PDE to the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency.  The bill was unanimously approved.

 

Last week, the following bills were introduced and referred to the House Education Committee:

 

  • House Bill 1348 (Rep. Thomas Killion, R-168) would allow charter and cyber charter schools to enter into concurrent enrollment agreements with institutions of higher education and award appropriate credits to students concurrently enrolled under the agreement.  HB 1348 would also repeal the current charter school law and replace it with a new article entitled “Charter Schools and Cyber Charter Schools.” 
  • House Bill 1359 (Rep. Todd Rock, R-90) would amend the Public School Code to provide for uniform standards for the certification of school crossing guards.
  • House Bill 1363 (Rep. Kathy Rapp, R-65) would suspend the requirements for continuing professional development for certificated educators until June 30, 2013. 
  • House Bill 1371 (Rep. Katharine Watson, R-144) would establish the Volunteer First Responders Loan Forgiveness Program within the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (PHEAA).
  • House Bill 1377 (Rep. Chelsa Wagner, D-22) would establish the Community College Educational Assistance Act.  The act would direct PHEAA to disregard one third of an eligible student's expected family contribution (EFC) and Federal Pell Grant award amount when calculating the eligible student's Pennsylvania State grant. 
  • House Bill 1378 (Rep. Dennis O’Brien, R-169) would require special education services to nonpublic students be provided by the intermediate unit  in which the nonpublic school is located in accordance with standards set by the Secretary of Education.
  • House Resolution 231 (Rep. Tim Mahoney, D-51) would encourage school districts in the Commonwealth to study the fiscal impact of consolidating the administrations of school districts within their county.

 

 

Senate

 

Ø  On April 26, the Senate confirmed the appointment of Ronald J. Tomalis as Secretary of Education. 

 

Ø  On April 27, Senate Bill 1 (Sen. Jeffrey Piccola, R-15), which would establish a tuition voucher program and expand the Educational Improvement Tax Credit (EITC) program, was re-referred to the Senate Education Committee.  According to Sen. Piccola, Chairman of the Senate Education Committee, an agreement has been reached with the administration and the bill will be amended in Committee to reflect the Governor’s desired changes. 

 

 

US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

 

Ø  On April 20, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius launched a new initiative to help educate graduating college and university seniors about their new health insurance options under the Affordable Care Act.  The initiative provides several resources for graduating students to learn about their options.  Information for young adults and parents is available at www.facebook.com/youngadultcoverage.   Additional resources for universities or student groups can be accessed by clicking here

 

Ø  Mid-May is the deadline for submission of applications under several USDE grant competitions, including the Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program (May 9), the Carol M. White Physical Education Program (May 13), and the Advanced Placement Incentive Program (May 16).

 

 

PA BULLETIN

 

Notice has been given in the PA Bulletin (Vol. 41, No.17) that the Office of Open Records (OOR) has updated the Standard Right-to-Know Request Form.  This form can be accessed from the OOR's web site at http://openrecords.state.pa.us.   For more information, click here.

 

 

ANNOUNCEMENTS

 

 

Ø  On April 25, parents from Shippensburg School District organized a “Billion Dollar Bake Sale for Education” at the state capitol to protest the Governor’s severe cuts to basic education funding.  Parents from several school districts voiced concern with the Governor’s proposed budget for education and what it means in terms of education quality and program offerings.

 

Ø  On April 26, Hundreds of students and advocates attended the “March for Education” rally in Harrisburg held by the NAACP to protest Governor Corbett’s proposed cuts to education.  The NAACP was joined by the Teamsters Union, several state lawmakers and education advocates.    

 

Ø  Recently, the Pennsylvania School Funding Campaign, a coalition of more than 30 statewide and regional education and advocacy organizations representing hundreds of thousands of parents, students, educators, school board members, administrators, and other concerned citizens advocating for adequate and equitable funding of Pennsylvania’s public schools, launched a new website encouraging individuals to sign a petition to stop the billion dollar cut to education.  To sign the online petition, visit www.stopthebilliondollarcut.org.

 

Ø  Also last week, the Pennsylvania Brain Injury Coalition held a rally at the state capitol to encourage the Legislature to take action on two bills (House Bill 200 and Senate Bill 200) that would establish standards for managing concussions and traumatic brain injuries in student athletes.  In addition, the coalition is asking lawmakers to ensure funding for Home and Community-Based Programs, create an Advisory Board, and incorporate brain injury screenings for persons in state programs and facilities

 

Ø  The Pittsburgh CAPA (Creative and Performing Arts) 6-12 is one of 6 finalists (and the only school in Pennsylvania) to have President Obama come to speak at its commencement.  The President will visit the winning high school to deliver the commencement address later this spring.  For more information, visit www.whitehouse.gov/commencement

 

 

DATEBOOK

 

·         The Pennsylvania House and Senate will reconvene at 1:00 PM on Monday, May 2, 2011.

 

·         The National Parent Teacher Association (PTA) is hosting “Teacher Appreciation Week” May 2-6For more information, click here.

 

·         The Coalition for Labor Engagement and Accountable Revenues (CLEAR) will hold a “Rally for a Responsible Budget” in Harrisburg on May 3 from 1:00 PM to 2:00 PM.  For more information, click here.

 

·         The House Education Committee will hold a meeting on Wednesday, May 4 at 9:30 AM to consider the following bills:  HB 1363, HB 1407 and HB 1411

 

·         Primary Election Day is Tuesday, May 17.

 

·         The State Board of Education will hold a meeting in Lancaster on Wednesday, May 18.

           

For information on upcoming events, please visit www.eplc.org and click on “Events Calendar”.

 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 

EPLC Education Notebook is published by The Education Policy and Leadership Center (EPLC).  Permission to reprint or electronically redistribute the Notebook in whole or in part is granted provided attribution to EPLC is provided.

 

The Education Policy and Leadership Center is an independent, non-partisan and not-for-profit organization. The Mission of EPLC is to encourage and support the enactment and implementation of effective state-level education policies in order to improve student learning in grades P-12, increase the effective operation of schools, and enhance educational opportunities for citizens of all ages.

____________________

Ronald Cowell

The Education Policy and Leadership Center

800 North Third Street, Suite 408

Harrisburg, PA 17102

717-260-9900

www.eplc.org