Thursday, January 26, 2017

Fwd: Life and Death

---------- Forwarded message

From: John Hemington

Attached are two, again eclectic, articles.  The first from Scientific American, unfortunately, was not read by a sufficient number of folks prior to the election as it is perhaps the best and most frightening description of our 45th president I have yet encountered (h/t Paula Lim).  If this doesn't make you even more nervous and chilled than you already are, you must have anti-freeze running through your veins.  

The second discusses one of America's many recent failures both from the standpoints of the neocons running the State and Defense Departments and from the rational believers in freedom and justice – the U.S.'s funding of terrorist mobsters to overthrow the Assad regime in Syria.  For all of politicians' rants about fighting terrorism in the world, there is no question, in my mind at least, that United States has incubated, funded and supplied 99% of the terrorists in the world, either directly or through proxies such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan.  This will be the lasting memorial of all U.S. administrations from Regan through Obama – and almost all of it done at the behest of Israel in a successful effort to destabilize or destroy all of the independent nationalist nations in the Mideast and Africa.

John

 Links




Fwd: Something eclectic this evening

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John Hemington

So much is happening and so little time to digest it all.  Attached are three distinctly different articles with no common theme whatsoever.  The first is a typically excellent post by Jim Kavanagh of The Polemicist discussing the situation in Syria as it relates to Russia, the U.S. and our fervent financial support of al Qaeda and al Nusra terrorists in that country – and how it has thus far backfired on us.  The second is an interesting article dealing with political parties as team sports and why, to quote the author, "It is important that we see through the charismatic character, that we analyze the practices rather than embrace the platitudes.  Americans tend to become so fixated on their particular "team" that we cannot root out the negative elements imposed by "our" political players.  This is an important point if we are to make any real progress moving forward.  The third article exposes a critical real-time right now crisis which we will all be facing before we realize it – the crisis of "clean" water availability.

John

 Links




  • Syria article in PDF



  • Team Sport and Politics article in PDF



  • Clean Water Crisis
  • Wednesday, January 25, 2017

    Zing!

    Jim R. Forsythe posted on Facebook's South Side Secrets page:

    Top ten Bruceisms!!

    1. We now have more Parking Enforcement Officers than pedestrians on East Carson Street.(ask the Pretzel shop).
    2. South Side hospital has closed for business.
    3. Zone 3 police station has closed for business, and soon to be up for sale.
    4. Vacancy on East Carson climbed from 5% to 35% in 7 years. 
    5. Beltzhoover and Knoxville havent seen the councilman in years, while the councilman is busy measuring sidewalk cafes on East Carson. 
    6. South Side Slopes and Hilltop infrastructure continues to crumble while Bruce eyes removing the Shriners Circus. 
    7. Residential parking plan that Bruce said cant be amended is now being amended. 
    8. While the East End and Lawernceville continue to grow and expand, Bruce opposes the 25 million dollar apartment complex on 23rd and Wharton. 
    9. Bruces staff turnover is more than hamburgers be flipped on East Carson. 
    10. Bruce shelves 300k hospitality study that he initiated because " he always knows better". 
    Stay tuned for the sequel because he just cant help himself! Can you believe we are paying Bruce Kraus with hard earned tax dollar money for his lack of council.
    Note: We will trade him for any other councilperson or a warm six pack!!

    Tuesday, January 24, 2017

    Political Songs are Fun.

    Really?

    Women at a big march are holding signs saying they hoped for the day when they'd have as many rights as a gun? You mean, they wish they could be banned from schools and other public places, closely monitored by the government, and scapegoated for the problems of society?
    From Tom Woods.

    New EdD at Pitt for OUT OF SCHOOL TIME study

    New Doctoral Degree in Out-of-School Learning

    University of Pittsburgh

    Responding to the needs of professionals looking to advance their careers, the
    University of Pittsburgh offers a Doctor of Education (EdD) in out-of-school learning.
    The part-time EdD is a three-year cohort-based degree program designed around
    the needs of working professionals with very clear timelines and an on-line course
    delivery model.

    The program is intended for experienced professionals who aspire to be
    transformational leaders in out-of-school learning. Prospective applicants might
    currently work in museums, out-of-school time (OST) settings, libraries, digital
    media/technology, university outreach/extension, policy groups and think tanks, life-long
    learning programs, parks, environmental centers, arts-based organizations, community
    settings, youth development, or the many other areas where we explore learning
    environments that exist outside of classrooms. Program faculty are expert in connecting
    research and practice and have experience across a wide range of out-of-school
    settings, audiences, and learning arrangements.

    Out-of-School Learning students are part of a larger, multidisciplinary EdD cohort of
    students from eight different specializations in education, offering rich opportunities for
    collaboration and broad learning about education. The core EdD curriculum covers
    educational foundations and methods of practitioner inquiry, while the specialized outof-school
    learning curriculum focuses on informal learning theory, organizational
    processes, applied life-long learning, and evidence-based change and evaluation.

    In addition to on-line work, most students in the EdD program come to Pittsburgh for
    occasional Saturday sessions with the entire EdD cohort. Students in the out-of-school
    learning program can opt for this on-line/face-to-face model or could choose a
    predominately on-line model. Students who do not live in Pennsylvania can apply for
    merit-based scholarships to help offset the cost of out-of-state tuition.
    We will launch our first cohort in May 2017. Applications are due February 1, 2017.

    For more information:
    Kevin Crowley, crowleyk
    Tom Akiva, tomakiva
    Jennifer Russell, jrussel

    Fwd: Industrial-Strength Islamophobia . . . and more

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: John Hemington


    This article is, I believe, an excellent analysis of where the Trump administration is headed.  It's not and should not be a great surprise to most of us, but it presages a dramatically bleak period of world history.  It means that Trump's people in the administration and in Congress will work tirelessly to turn Americans against one another (more than even the neoliberals have managed to do) and then against the rest of the world.  It will be a most challenging period for anyone who believes in freedom, democracy and human rights.  It means that we will have to come together in strong communities in order to survive.  It means that we may well experience a more comprehensive period of totalitarian control of our lives than anyone may have thought possible – a totalitarianism which will make Orwell's 1984 seem positively mild by comparison. 

    There is no time to waste.  We must begin organizing today developing allies who will stand up to the forces of darkness likely to be unleashed by this administration.  It is not sufficient to know that oppression is happening.  Together we must develop strategies for defending ourselves and others against the coming storm; as well as programs of education for ourselves and others to learn and share from one another what is happening, why it is happening, who or what is behind it and how it can be fought.  As never before, time is of the essence.


    John

     Links



    Kickoff for Pittsburgh Mayor Candidate, John Welsh, seeking the D-Party nomination in spring 2017

    Video camera of a Saturday event at the Homewood Library featured a new candidate to challenge for the Dem Party Nomination for Mayor, City of Pittsburgh.

    Exciting event in terms of audience and messages of the need for a new movement in Pittsburgh.

    These are three segments (not complete) from the podium.







    Family photo after the speech:



    Big welcome for a movement:





    Fwd: The Trump year

    ---------- Forwarded message
    From: John Hemington


    The first attachment poses an interesting question, how long can Trump last.  This is not the only commentator to suggest this and I believe that it is a fair one.  It is pretty clear that the Republican hierarchy doesn't much like Trump, but they do like Pence a lot.  It is also clear that the intelligence community doesn't like him at all as he is the first president since John Kennedy to threaten to reduce the size of the CIA (Kennedy threatened to eliminate it) – and we know what happened to Kennedy.  On the other side of the picture, it appears to me that Trump may well be a brilliant strategist.  If you haven't noticed he has managed to get virtually the entire media talking about nothing but the size of the crowd at the inauguration and the number of "illegals" who voted for Hillary.  There is almost nothing being said about what it is that Trump is actually doing to us and this may be an accident of hubris and narcissism or it may be fully intentional.

    The second attachment dwells on just what kind of a country do we want this to be.  This is an important question and one which I'm not certain enough of us have pondered for some time.  Perhaps now we will all be forced to.

    John

    1. Impeached or two terms?
    2. What is a country for? 


    Friday, January 20, 2017

    New running mates

    Fwd: Attend the Summit on Digital Credentials and Badges



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: IMS Global Learning Consortium


    Summit on Digital Credentials and Badges
    View this email in your browser

    A full day of digital badges.


    IMS Global Learning Consortium is holding a Summit on Digital Credentials and Badges, Tuesday, February 28, in Orlando, Florida.

    As a participant in the Open Badges movement, we invite you to attend!

    The program features an exciting lineup of speakers and panelists representing K-20 and non-traditional issuing organizations, employers, and market leaders who are invested in accelerating the progress of digital credentialing in learning and professional development.
    Learn More
    And following the Summit, you can join IMS Global for a special Open Badges Community meeting on Wednesday, March 1. We hope to see you in Orlando!

    Registration is open to everyone. All attendees must register in advance. This event will be held at the Hard Rock Hotel at Universal Orlando. The deadline for making hotel reservations is January 27. Space is limited, so don't delay.
    Thanks to our Digital Credentialing, Badges & CBE Initiative Sponsors
    Copyright © 2017 IMS Global Learning Consortium, All rights reserved. Trademark Information

    You are receiving this email because you participated in the Open Badges community group.

    Our mailing address is:
    IMS Global Learning Consortium
    801 International Parkway, Lake Mary, FL
    5th Floor, PMB #112
    Lake Mary, FL 32746


    Thursday, January 19, 2017

    Fwd: [DW] [civicmedia-researchers] CFP: Abusive Language Online

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Steven Clift 




    Democracies Online
    Photo of Steven Clift
    [civicmedia-researchers] CFP: Abusive Language Online
    by Steven Clift
    in Newswire - Steven Clift's Democracies Online Newswire

    See CFP below ...

    A comment ... as someone monitors all sorts of political online groups on
    Facebook, the conspiratorial tone is a return of what I saw on political
    USENET newsgroups back in the 1990s. They were essentially anonymous and
    totally chaotic or totally controlled if moderate (to keep politics out of
    groups). It was terrible stuff.

    Crafting another way led to E-Democracy's real name accountability based
    forums with strong civility and active human facilitation. We did this in
    1994 a decade before Facebook brought to the masses.

    Again and again, folks hope for the magic bullet of cheap technology to
    police the abuse at a low cost. Look at news online commenting. It doesn't
    work or only can only help boost the essential role of active facilitators
    that are supported by good rules and a culture of respect for their
    leadership. Facilitators need to be real named people and not the mystery
    man behind the curtain.

    While real names work well on Facebook and encourage accountability and
    self-control/censorship among "friends" and on public posts, the
    introduction of less visible (to your friends and relatives) posts to
    closed and secret groups have unleashed the beast inside of many of us.
    Further with hundreds of millions of people online in the US for example,
    you only need a small small percentage of people who feel they have nothing
    to lose by being nasty as can be or worse when they comment on the White
    House Facebook Page or a local news story about Somali immigrants in
    Minnesota for example.

    On top of this, with Twitter and Facebook profiles, the masses now have
    public calling cards on the Internet which makes it 100x easier for anyone
    to be privately contacted or publicly shamed. Previously only a small
    percentage of individual people had websites or blogs.

    So back to crafting another way ... that is what I am seeing on the best
    Facebook Groups. Active facilitators, participants respecting those
    leaders, and removing the abusers, spammers, or those unwilling or unable
    (can be tied to severe antisocial behavioral medical conditions) to follow
    the rules or get along with others. So to those looking to connect
    non-friends online be bold and build another way. To those orgs who sponsor
    online exchange, start investing in what really works - people as active
    leaders and facilitators.

    Steven Clift
    E-Democracy
    P.S. For orgs looking for great professional online facilitators who can
    handle politics, I can hook you up.



    From: "Andrew Whitacre" <awhit@mit.edu>
    Date: Jan 19, 2017 8:52 AM
    Subject: [civicmedia-researchers] CFP: Abusive Language Online
    To: <cmsw-all@mit.edu>, "civicmedia-researchers" <
    civicmedia-researchers@mit.edu>
    Cc:

    Part of the annual meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics
    2017 (Vancouver), August 3rd (or) 4th, 2017

    https://www.hastac.org​/opportunities​/cfp​-1st​-workshop​-abusive​-language​-
    online

    Snippet:

    Overview


    The last few years have seen a surge in abusive online behavior, with
    governments, social media platforms, and individuals struggling to cope
    with the consequences. Online forums, comment sections, and social media
    interaction in general have become a playground of bullying, scapegoating,
    and hate speech. These forms of online aggression not only poison the
    social climate of the communities that experience it, but also lower the
    inhibition for direct physical violence, and increasingly even result in it.

    As a field that directly works with computing over language, Natural
    Language Processing researchers are in a unique position to develop
    automated methods to analyse, detect, and filter abusive language.
    Additionally, we recognize that addressing abusive language is not solely
    the purview of NLP approaches but is a truly multi-disciplinary problem and
    thus requires knowledge from other fields, including but not limited to:
    psychology, sociology, law, gender studies, digital communication, and
    critical race theory.

    In this one day workshop, we aim to provide a space for researchers of
    various disciplines to meet and discuss approaches to abusive language. The
    workshop will include invited speakers and panelists from fields outside of
    NLP, as well as solicit papers from researchers across all areas. In
    addition, the workshop will host an "unshared task".

    Paper Topics

    We invite long and short papers on any of the following general topics:

    -

    NLP models and methods for abusive language detection
    -

    Application of NLP tools to analyze social media content and other large
    data sets
    -

    NLP models for cross-lingual abusive language detection
    -

    The social and personal consequences of being the target of abusive
    language and targeting others with abusive language
    -

    Assessment of current non-NLP methods of addressing abusive language
    -

    Legal ramifications of measures taken against abusive language use


    -

    Best practices for using NLP techniques in watchdog settings
    -

    Development of corpora and annotation guidelines


    Panel Discussion Topics

    Potential panel discussion topics reflect the relevance for industry and
    individuals:

    -

    Responsibility of companies and governments in monitoring speech
    -

    Privacy and ethical implications of abusive language detection (false
    positives)
    -

    Follow-up: what to do when a community experiences abusive language
    -

    Personal experiences from individuals who have been threatened online
    -

    Best methods for cross-pollination of ideas between fields


    Andrew Whitacre
    Communications Director
    Comparative Media Studies/Writing
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology (snips) | cmsw.mit.edu


    Tuesday, January 17, 2017

    Fwd: Let there be proof



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: John Hemington <jehemington@verizon.net>



    It's well past time for the Obama administration to put up or shut up on this issue – and time is running out.  In the first article More than 20 U.S. intelligence, military and diplomatic veterans are calling on President Obama to release the evidence backing up allegations that Russia aided the Trump campaign – or admit that the proof is lacking.  This is not a trivial issue and could eventually lead to a nuclear confrontation with Russia.  If it is true Americans need some certainty before unleashing the dogs in the Defense Department.  If is nothing but a cover for Hillary's election loss it is doubly preposterous and destructive.   Senator John McCain has already declared it an act of war which must be retaliated against.  We must know and we must know before Obama leaves office. 


    John

    Links to articles in PDFs


    Fwd: . . . and on it goes

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: John Hemington

    We remain deeply embroiled in a serious class war in which young adults have become the most recent victims.  It's not just college graduates broken down with almost unpayable debts, it's also those without an opportunity to go to college who can't find jobs paying a living wage or any job at all.  It's minority youth of all stripes who are denied essential opportunities in a not-so-colorblind society as we would like to think.  Check out the attached article for additional information.

    And lest we forget, young adults are not the only Americans suffering from this long-standing class war which resulted in the election of Donald Trump.  As this excerpt from Greg Maybury's article in Consortium News,  Fall and Rise of the Forgotten 'Deplorables' (see second attachment for full article), points our two major political have long ago abandoned and declared war on the rest of us also:

    "In what must serve as the quintessential master class of prolonged, consistent, truly bi-partisan cooperation American politics has on offer, both parties have contributed enormously over the past three-plus decades to the dismantling if not effective destruction of the American Dream in its hitherto real and imagined dimensions.

    Whether on broad economic, social, national security, or foreign policy issues, both parties have demonstrated a recidivistic, palpable indifference to the concerns and needs of average working- and middle-class Americans, with both repeatedly showing themselves prone to elitism, corruption, cronyism, manipulation, greed, deception, bribery, hypocrisy, opportunism, self-interest, contempt, cynicism and arrogance.

    In the process democracy's once "proprietary" domains — equal justice, freedom, human rights, equality of opportunity, civil rights, liberty, and most everything from habeas corpus to the pursuit of happiness — have effectively been declared "no-fly-zones" for ordinary people, accessible only to those increasingly privileged, mostly unelected, and thoroughly unaccountable few.

    Most significantly, both parties have undermined, possibly irreparably, the sense of pride and place folks had in their once beloved — but now maybe not so — United States of America.  Along with that, they have all but conspired to "deep-six" that once famously enduring, optimistic mindset that by some accounts enabled the country to thrive and prosper as a "paradise of opportunity" (or even a reasonable facsimile thereof).

    Let's term that period The Era of Future Promise, or that time in history — from 1945 to say 1975 — where a whole generation or more of the majority of folks could not only envision a progressively better future for their kids and grandchildren, but anticipated it, and all things equal, if one was willing to strive for such, rightfully expected it.
    That is no longer the case for an increasing number of people, and it is this sentiment — one whose seismic impact we have just witnessed — that's been neglected by both party majors.  That this envisioned future is no longer realistic for many comes as a direct result of neoliberalism — the roll-out of which was overseen by both parties — and with it the globalization of economic and financial activity itself culminating from there via "casino capitalism" in the inexorable transfer and consolidation of historically unprecedented wealth, power, and income into the hands of fewer and fewer people — is inarguable.

    Now the end of this earlier era might have been heralded by Reagan's ascension in 1981 and the advent of neoliberalism.  But its sustained demise was enthusiastically presided over by Bill Clinton, in cahoots of course with this year's DNC candidate for president, his wife Hillary, and the then Party establishment.  Some folks clearly haven't forgotten that.  In short, there was no clear sign from Clinton that things would be substantially different under her regime than under that of her husband's administration.

    And for those who understood there being such a thing as a "class war" and viewed globalization and neoliberalism through such a prism — if we recognize that the upper class won that war a long time ago — we might posit the following:  Why when after the vanquished have long since surrendered to distraction, disillusion or outright despondency are the victors still fighting the war?  Before this election, the short answer we might have suggested is that it's because they can!

    The ascension of Sanders and Trump in this election demonstrated that vast masses of Americans have finally given up on the two elitist Parties and are ready to fight back; but unfortunately most of us still don't understand what's behind the system which oppresses so many while promising so much.  It is now imperative that we somehow figure out a way to redirect this anger and frustration into meaningful action.

    Fight on!

    John

    Links from John's collection



    Sunday, January 15, 2017

    Fwd: Health care disaster continues

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: John Hemington

    As we are dragged kicking and screaming into the frightening new era of Trumplandia, it is worth reexamining one of the issues which is most important to most Americans.  As most of you are aware, I am no fan of either Barak Obama or his namesake health abomination the Affordable Care Act.  Don't get me wrong, the ACA has, in fact, helped many Americans who would otherwise not have been able to get any health insurance at all.  That is, however, a very sad commentary given the kind of efficient, effective and affordable health care all Americans should be entitled to receive.  As it is, even with the ACA the U.S. has the least efficient, least effective and most expensive health care system of any developed nation in the world – and this is not an accident.  Obama and his New Democrat cohorts deliberately crafted the ACA (actually it was crafted by lobbyists from the pharmaceutical and insurance oligopolies and simply implemented by the New Democrats) to benefit their moneyed paymasters; and sold as the most wondrous thing since Wonder Bread (another not very good idea).  I know that I'm preaching to the choir on this, but it cannot be overstated – we deserve better, and we must demand better. 

    There is no better time to stand up and demand what should have been done long ago than when things appear to be at their bleakest.  Many of us are depressed (though not defeated) by the ascension of Donald Trump to the presidency.  But, think about it, is the prospect of a Trump presidency really all that much worse than what we have had forty years or so?  It could be but for the first time in a while people who have been seduced by lesser evil Democratic Party scare tactics may be willing to get off the fence, stand up and fight for something important.  And yes, I realize that the issues included in the "identity politics" milieu are important; but also important (and in some ways more so) are issues of endless war, health care for all, control of the financial overlords, corporate money in politics, elimination of austerity politics, meaningful jobs for the poor and working classes paying living wages, global warming and environmental destruction and a host of others the New Democrats have chosen tot to address with any real gusto or ignore completely.  This is a process which is designed and intended to keep Americans separated and effectively at war with one another.  It is the essential construct of neoliberalism and it has worked far better than even the most hard-core neoliberal could have imagined.

    Like the Republican Party the Democratic Party has no present intention of addressing any of these core issues.  We are, and have been for many years like it or not, been embroiled in an ever escalating class war and the plutocrats and their political minions have so disarmed the rest of us with ceaseless propaganda and endless new techno-toys intended to keep us helplessly indulged in a mindless frenzy of consumerism.  They tell us that only their "experts" can understand, explain and establish government policy.  They tells us the federal government out of money and being hopelessly constrained by unpayable debt – but it is never a problem when the funding of endless war or the bailing out of the financial system to the tune of 29 trillion dollars is concerned.  The money is always available for corporate needs, but when peoples' needs are mentioned the cupboard is bare and austerity is the stock answer.  This is why we have no government provided health care for all.

    I believe strongly that one of our most important tasks is to share as widely as possible the reality behind the neoliberal myths which have been promulgated via state and think tank propaganda and political lies ever since Maggie Thatcher and Ronald Reagan assumed power in Great Britain and the United States in the 1980s.  We are most certainly engaged in a class war and for the moment only the ruling class is engaged.  It is time that the rest of us began our offensive against our rulers.  But in order to effectively organize ourselves, I believe that we must first come to understand the myths we have been sold and why they are destructive lies which have kept us separated for so long. 

    Socialists, Progressives, Liberals and those on the political left cannot effectively engage, nor can we ever win this class war on our own – and we have a long history of fighting one another.  We must somehow learn to engage with those on the right side of the political spectrum, remembering that they are just as splintered and confused as are we.  We have to stop being enemies and become allies wherever possible.  And, yes, there are some on both sides we will never be able to reach.  That is just the way things are and won't be changed no matter what we or they do.  But that should not dissuade us from the task at hand.  When I speak of education I certainly do not mean "smart" liberals talking down to "dumb deplorables" as the New Democrats seem prone to do.  I mean listening exchanging views and ideas, explaining differences and hearing others' experiences and what they have learned from years of systemic abuse and neglect.  This can be much more important and more powerful than anything we might have to offer from our life experiences.

    I started this by talking about health care because I believe that it is an issue we can all discuss and share experiences and ideas.  It is a problem for all of us who do not dwell in the gated compounds of the 1%.  I also believe that the reality behind fiat money, debt and credit are subjects which must be brought into the open if we are to have any change to break through to the other side with social solutions.  As long as a majority of Americans continue to buy into the myth of the national debt as a constraining inhibitor limiting their and their children's opportunities there will be no opportunity to convince them of the benefits of collective action and governmental social programs.  In short we need two-way teaching and we need it now.  I am not at all certain how best to accomplish this, but I think that some significant collective effort must be put forth to find out.  Absent that we will continue to get kicked to the side of the road by our "betters" in the plutocracy.



    John


    Links