Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Fw: [PURE Reform] New comment on Athletic recommendations released.

Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®


From: Anonymous <noreply-comment@blogger.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 12:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: <mark.rauterkus@gmail.com>
Subject: [PURE Reform] New comment on Athletic recommendations released.

Anonymous has left a new comment on the post "Athletic recommendations released":

We continue to talk as though kids cannot be motivated to learn unless extrinsically rewarded or punished. The reality that we've lost sight of is that every kid inherently wants to learn and in fact IS learning all of the time. Poor grades, suspension, detention, expulsion, 10th periods, "interventions", removal of music, arts, athletics only serve to further marginalize, ostracize, drop out, alienate, victimize, disenfranchise, etc. our young people. Opportunities to develop productive futures based natural talents, desires, goals are closed off by school administrators in PPS who believe that "one-size--fits-all" and that negative consequences will somehow 'turn on lights" motivate, inspire, and prepare students for productive futures. It does not work for the vast majority. How many failures, drop outs, jails do we need to see before we begin to change our educational systems in ways that produce intelligent, educated, athletic, artistic, creative, productive, successful adults?

Post a comment.

Unsubscribe to comments on this post.

Posted by Anonymous to PURE Reform at May 11, 2011 3:00 PM

Two Athletic Reform Documents

Two documents from last night's school board meeting with Pittsburgh Public Schools' Education Committee are now available.

The executive summary is 13 pages:

PDF

Slide share:


The presentation was put onto video tape that night but is going to take some time to put onto the web. There were a number of questions from the board members, naturally.

The longer document is 71 pages and in PDF format.

http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/aforathlete/images/e/ef/Athletics_Reform_Recommendations.pdf

Or here in SlideShare.



Tip: Click the button on the lower right corner to expand the document to your full screen size. Press the "Esc" key to return the computer screen to continue.

City League, WPIAL merger still far off - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

This is a concern from an educator:
City League, WPIAL merger still far off - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review: "'What would it mean, in terms of what time kids would have to leave in the afternoon to go to games? What would our costs be for the transportation? What about our families who don't have access to a car? How do they get to watch their daughter play basketball if it's not here in Pittsburgh? Those are some of the things we need to think about.'"
Her concern is unfounded.

To join the WPIAL is just what students, teachers, coaches and families need when it comes to missing less classroom time.

Presently, in the PPS City League, (District 8, not WPIAL), the sports schedules include plenty of games and matches at 2:15 pm. The kids need to miss their last period, at the least, even if playing a HOME game. The kids who are going to play the game at another school's pool, gym or field depart earlier and often have to miss most of the afternoon of classes.

Meanwhile, afternoon games -- while kids are still to be in classes -- do not happen on a daily basis within the WPIAL schedule. The WPIAL is filled with evening games. Then parents can get home from work and go to watch their children play. And, above all, the students don't need to be pulled from classes.

In the city, we play a lot of 2 pm games because if the kids when to a whole day of school, then had to care for themselves for a couple of hours and get on a bus at 5 pm or so, some whould not show up. And with an evening game, there are other time problems too, such as a return trip to home at 10 or 11 pm, often on a school night.

The abundance of 2 pm games on the PPS sports schedule is not 'fan friendly' nor 'family friendly.' Getting younger siblings to the high school games are often impossible too.

With the current system, plenty of athletes miss plenty of classes, and those coaches who are teachers miss as well. I've heard of baseball coaches who are also teachers in core subjects who have to miss two consecutive weeks of classes with those in periods 6 and 7. They are in the building until the team needs to go to play a game, either home or away, with a 1 pm dismissal. That isn't fair to the students who have those periods with those teachers to miss so much instructional time.

In the city league, those afternoon games are a big problem. Moving to evening and night games makes another set of problems, no doubt. But, when it comes to missing class time, there would be a lot less of that going on with a move to the WPIAL.

We talked in the athletic reform committee about a few elements that would need to occur to make the move to the WPIAL work for the PPS student athletes in terms of the schedule adjustments to evening matches.

+ Night games and longer bus rides in some instances means that the kids get back to the school at later times. Arrival to the school at 9, 9:30, 10, or 10:30 pm is not out of the question. Consider a Friday night football game that starts at 7:30 pm. Those kids are getting back to their home school after an away game at 11 pm or so. The rub is with PAT, the public bus schedules, and a city-wide magnet. Students get to their home schools after the game but these are not NEIGHBORHOOD schools any more. A kid who goes to a North Side or East Side school might live in the other end of the city, say the South Side. We know that the bus schedules have been greatly reduced. The non-peak times of buses are on a schedule that is often one hour between pick-ups, if the bus runs at all. Using mass transit and getting from Peabody or Westinghouse at 10 or 11 pm to the North Side or West End after a big game is asking plenty.

As a solution, we'd need to work hard to drop off kids at various parts of the city from the team bus on the way home and the bus would need to have to make a run out to various points after visiting the home school. Car pools are necessary too.

+ Night games are fan friendly. They'd attract more people. It is dark. In the winter, it is also cold.

+ The student athletes need places at the schools to be open for them upon their return. Getting dropped off by a team bus and waiting outside is not prudent.

+ The student athletes need places at the schools open to them for non-playing time situations. Kids need places to hang and be productive from 2:30 pm (end of school day) to they depart at 5 pm for an away game or are due to hit the locker-room for their home game at 6 pm. Team rooms, weight rooms, cardio rooms, training facilities, student lounges, on-school coffee shops, library access and rec room settings are needed. Getting into the library to do homework after school is a problem now. To extend library time to 6 pm, only now and then as homework is due and as the team needs it -- while eating even -- is a dreamworld fantasy the way things operate now.

+ The student athletes need to be concerned with nutrition and food. We are hungry. We need a good meal. We need to eat after school on game days and practice days. We need to hydrate. We need more than a vending machine. Kids should not need to sneak to find access to a microwave oven just to have something warm to eat before or after practice and games.

With an evening game, many of the kids won't have the time to go home after school, eat, do homework, and return for the game. They'll need to be productive at the school in places where they don't get into trouble.

People have been known to freak out when a single McDonalds wrapper comes back into the school's doors. I'm talking about PRINCIPALS. Sure, kids need to put their trash in the cans, but expectations and hospitality at the schools for being a place for our young people to settle and be secure are far from ideal within PPS. They've been promised student lounges in the past and they've never been delivered, unless there is a whole building re-hab as is the case at Sci-Tech. Even there, getting access to a student lounge in odd times is doubtful.

We need to care for our kids well beyond the end of the school day or the end of the last play in the game. And often, the kids face hostilities around their schools even from within. Perhaps this is part of the duties of the boosters and volunteers, granted. But those in PPS have a lock it and leave it mentality that can't work with a reform agenda that keeps our kids productive settings.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Erik's TV interview about Sports Reform in Pittsburgh Public Schools

This is part 2 of the interview that should run on TV soon. Erik Rauterkus, 16, (proud dad moment injected here), sophomore, gives a sit-down interview with activist and show host, Kenneth Miller, about sports reform pending before the board of directors of Pittsburgh Public Schools. The conversation is pressing as the matter goes to the Education Committee, a sub-group of the board, tonight. The decision is pressing in light of the state budget cuts and the outward migration of many in the city.

The city schools are shrinking! Families that desire great opportunities for their children often move out of Pittsburgh, in large part, in my not so humble opinion, because of the lack of quality offerings in sports, music, after-school activities and holistic living beyond the end of the school day.

Watch this show segment and hear from me again, at the end of the clip.



The other part of the interview will be put online as time permits.

WPIAL, here we come, perhaps, sorta, we hope, one day, maybe.

Monday, May 09, 2011

On the Elimination of Osama bin Laden

Ron Paul's remarks make sense to me, again.
On the Elimination of Osama bin Laden: "Last week marked an important milestone in the war on terrorism for our country. Osama bin Laden applauded the 9/11 attacks. Such deliberate killing of innocent lives deserved retaliation. It is good that bin Laden is dead and justice is served. The way in which he was finally captured and killed shows that targeted retribution is far superior to wars of aggression and nation-building. In 2001 I supported giving the president the authority to pursue those responsible for the vicious 9/11 attacks. However, misusing that authority to pursue nation-building and remaking the Middle East was cynical and dangerous, as the past ten years have proven.

It is tragic that it took ten years, trillions of dollars, tens of thousands of American casualties and many thousands of innocent lives to achieve our mission of killing one evil person. A narrow, targeted mission under these circumstances was far superior to initiating wars against countries not involved in the 9/11 attacks, and that is all we should have done. This was the reason I emphasized at the time the principle of Marque and Reprisal, permitted to us by the US Constitution for difficult missions such as we faced. I am convinced that this approach would have achieved our goal much sooner and much cheaper.

Schenley musicals go out on high note with spunky 'Seussical'

Now that's drama.
Schenley musicals go out on high note with spunky 'Seussical': "Because I'm writing an elegy as much as a review, let's anoint the Cat the animating spirit not just of this musical or even the Schenley musical comedy tradition but high school musicals in general, which have to use their wits in the struggle to survive in the jungle of budget cuts in competition with the bigger, more voracious beasts of sports."
Yeah, right. Sports in the city are not so voracious nor beasts.

Others can divide between music and sports -- but that is not my mission. I fight for both. I want cooperation among the productions -- from the athletic venue to the stage.

This Tuesday is a good example. One of my sons will be in a competition and the other is in a school music event. But both -- or all kids -- should have great opportunities for whatever they should desire in structured, energetic, educational endeavors.

Koch files ethics, but not court, complaint against Bruce Kraus, hypocrite

Bruce Kraus fumbles, big time.
Koch files ethics, but not court, complaint: "Bruce Kraus is a hypocrite who refuses to follow his own laws. How can we trust him with the welfare of the city of Pittsburgh when he cannot follow the very laws that he wrote and is subject to? Its deceptive, hypocritical and reveals a dangerous proclivity to say one thing, do another and violate the law for his own benefit.

Mr. Koch is considering all possible avenues in an attempt to address this matter. He is filing his ethically sound financial disclosure reports to the Allegheny County Board of Elections by todays deadline."
I was there when this law was hatched. I helped it NOT occur in an earlier edition. Then I was put onto the task force to help craft the law.

Some of what I wanted did NOT make it into the law. Some did.

But with this fumble from Bruce Kraus, if it was up to me, and I speak as a member of the task force appointed to study and craft a bill for city council, I would have the guilty with a scarlet letter punishment. This means that Bruce Kraus would not get any more pay checks. He could keep his seat, but the controller would suspend his pay until he resigned. Then if he did resign, he'd be able to run again the next time. Or, he can choose to not follow the rules and serve out his term -- but not get paid anything to do so.

Furthermore, those that paid the extra money to the candidate would be on a black list and those people and firms would not be able to get any money from the city either. Once Kraus was out of office, they'd be okay to resume business with the city.

In the city, we choose to not sell property to anyone who has an outstanding property tax due to the city. That is a good policy. This punishment option I suggest is similar. The city should choose to not do business nor make city payouts to anyone that choose to break the campaign finance laws of the city.

2 Political Junkies: Campaign Shenanigans

2 Political Junkies: Campaign Shenanigans: "Campaign Shenanigans"

Doug Shields is toast.

Come Live Over Here - Moving to Pittsburgh

A woman on Linked In posted:
I will be moving closer to Pittsburgh with my son. Need neighborhood advice.

I would like to know which areas of the city is quiet, inexpensive, and low crime rate. Could anyone in the group give me advice?
A nice discussion unfolds.

Some highlights:

Ed wrote: I just moved to Pittsburgh last July. I have 2 sons that are 15 and 13.
We moved into the Avonworth School district which is a hightly rated, small Class A school in the North Hills. My kids adapted great and made good friends right away.
There are several areas to live with a wide range of home prices so I am sure you could find something either in Ohio Township, Emsworth, Ben Avon or Sewickley.
Steeler Chris Hoke and Penquins Coach Dan Blysma both have kids attending
the in the Avonworth School District. I highly recommend it!
Summary: Making friends is important, as are sporting families in the neighborhood. And my take: Sports is a way to make friends. Plus, being in a highly rated yet smaller school is prime. Avenworth is a smaller-sized WPIAL school. Avonworth is a bit larger than Our Lady of the Sacred Heart High School, and the boys at CAPA. But not as big but very near to the classifications of Pittsburgh Sci-Tech, Pgh Oliver, Pgh Langley or Pgh U-Prep. Avonworth High School would not be highly rated if it played sports against all the biggest teams in the WPIAL.

Another voice: Leon posted:
Like Ed above I moved in July of last year. I have a 12 & 17 yr. old. We did extensive research on schools and looked at Upper St. Clair, Mt Lebanon and Hampton. We came from Indianapolis area and chose Hampton (20 minutes north of downtown) due the schools.

What sealed the deal was the visit to Hampton. Smaller but very tight knit, excellent academics, decent sports & music. The teachers and admin staff were very open and welcoming. Based on the kid's progress this year it was a good decision.
See how "decent sports and music matter to people.

Then Lu from Monroeville posted about having 5 neighborhood pools that are volunteer run, and kids only have to swim a length to be on a team (ours gives 6 weeks of daily lessons for 45$). Most neighborhoods are attached at some point to a park; ours has a dog park and a walking trail in the woods. Lately people have been down there playing cricket. So it's an interesting place!

Right on! Swimming and international sports. See the trend yet?

Pittsburgh Public Schools has some way better than 'decent' music and sports opportunities -- but its hit or miss. And, at times, things in those realms can suck.

People are moving to the area, but not to the city so much, based upon some clearly seen opportunities to play well with others and all that sports brings to their lives. Pittsburgh needs some type of sports reform in these matters.

Friday, May 06, 2011

My political hero!

I didn't get a chance to watch the whole debate last night, but here's a condensed version with Ron Paul's answers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMmVwW8h4Ho

Parkways to display estimated travel times

Parkways to display estimated travel times: "Parkways to display estimated travel times"



So is this going to be a signal as to how many text messages one can reply to then?

I would rather see a display of available sparking spaces as one enters the South Side, or the North Shore, or the Arena area.

Or, how about a display of the minutes until the bus arrives posted at the bus stop?

Or, how about, minutes until the draw bridge lifts, ... wait. We don't have one of those. Never mind.

How about the number of minutes for the length of term of some local politicians?

Education Week: Let's Focus on Gaps in Opportunity, Not Achievement

Education Week: Let's Focus on Gaps in Opportunity, Not Achievement: "Let's Focus on Gaps in Opportunity, Not Achievement"

The opportunity gap is large when considering the opportunities of those in suburban schools and the others in the Pittsburgh Public Schools in terms of sports and athletics.

What happens in the WPIAL is not like what happens in the City League.

What happens at WPIAL schools is not like what we provide to PPS schools.

Who the he'll is this unknown Daniel Malloy?

By Daniel Malloy, Post-Gazette Washington Bureau

"Lesser known." What hole has he been living in for the past decade?

Ron Paul is a member of the US Congress. You would think a Washington based reporter would know that. And this is the third time Doctor Paul has run for the office of US President. First as a Libertarian, then as the last one standing in the last election where McCain got the nomination of the Rs.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11126/1144518-84.stm

Thursday, May 05, 2011

Sports is out of whack | Professional | NewJerseyNewsroom.com -- Your State. Your News.

Two decades later, sports is out of whack | Professional | NewJerseyNewsroom.com -- Your State. Your News.: "Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson moving as much earth as he could to try and keep the city's National Basketball Association team in team in town despite the fact that the unemployment level had hit 12 percent in his region. At the same time he was rounding up $10 million in marketing partnership for the owners of the NBA Kings, the Maloof brothers, Johnson was cutting workers at the city's police and fire departments and school administrators were trying to figure out whether they can keep sports going in Sacramento public schools."
If professional sports teams in North America had RELIGATION, then that problem in Sacramento would not happen. We need to insist that cities that want to have big league teams PLAY into those leagues by insisting that the worst of the major league teams drop down to a minor level to make room for the new arrivals. Moving a team is NOT an option. Then all are held hostage. But, building a team, from the bottom or from minors is a great option. Furthermore, those that squander a slot in the top league need to know performance matters, or else.

Wednesday, May 04, 2011

The Pittsburgh Comet hits against Bruce Kraus too

The Pittsburgh Comet: "Koch gets Kraus on Campaign Ethics Issue"

Bruce Kraus is not well suited to be in elected office in this country.

Let's get ready to rumble! 9 PM 2012 GOP debate on Thursday

Debate day moneybomb: http://www.debateday.com/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/04/gop-hopefuls-ready-rumble-2012-presidential-debate/

Debate Day MoneyBomb
When: Thursday, May 5, 2011 9:00 PM

Debate Day Money Bomb: NEW CAMPAIGN SITE http://www.ronpaul2012.com/

The first nationally televised Republican presidential debate in the 2012 election cycle will be held on May 5, 2011. Because of this, it is imperative to showcase Ron Paul as the leading frontrunner in the race. On May 5, 2011, we will hold an online money bomb in support of Ron Paul for President 2012. A money bomb is a 24-hour fundraising event aimed at dramatically increasing funds for a specific candidate. In November 2007, Ron Paul raised more than $4.2 million in a single day. In December 2007, Ron Paul raised the most money in the history of American politics in a single day, raising more than $6 million; a record that still holds strong to this very day.

Please invite your friends, and tell them that it is essential that we all donate to Ron Paul on May 5, 2011, in preparation for the first nationally televised Republican presidential debate for 2012.
The money bomb will likely be held on Ron Paul's official campaign website, which will be linked here once it is created. For now, please visit http://www.LibertyPAC.com, and consider making a donation before the official money bomb. OR you can visit http://www.debateday.com/ and pledge your donation today as well.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/04/gop-hopefuls-ready-rumble-2012-presidential-debate/

Republicans Deny They Plan to End Medicare

Recently the U.S. House of Representatives passed a measure that would drastically change the Medicare program. The measure, part of a budget authored by Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, passed with the votes of all but four Republicans and not one Democrat.

Now the Democratic Congressional Committee is running an ad in selected congressional against Republican congress members thought to be vulnerable. The ad, which portrays seniors having to work at odd jobs to pay for their medical care, includes the line, “Congressman [name] voted to end Medicare forcing seniors to pay $12,500 for private health insurance, without guaranteed coverage.”

A spokesperson for the National Republican Congressional Committee calls the ad “shameless scare tactics” on the part of Democrats. In particular, they say they are not ending Medicare, put reforming it to save it.

Who is telling the truth? It’s important for voters to understand this issue, which may dominate next year’s elections. A recent Washington Post/ABC News poll found that 78 percent of Americans are opposed to cutting Medicare. For more than 40 years American seniors have relied on Medicare for their essential, and often expensive, health care needs. For example, the deadly lung cancer mesothelioma is nearly always diagnosed in people in or approaching their Medicare years.

The Republian position was bolstered by the fact-check site PolitiFact.com, which judged the ad to be misleading.

“Yes, the Republican plan would be a huge change to the current program, and seniors would have to pay more for their health plans if it becomes law. Democrats, including President Barack Obama, have said they are strongly opposed to the plan.

“But to say the Republicans voted to end Medicare, as the ad does, is a major exaggeration. All seniors would continue to be offered coverage under the proposal, and the program’s budget would increase every year.”

The primary point of the ad was that seniors would pay more for health care under the Republican plan, and PoliFact admits this is true. But Republicans aren’t ending Medicare, just changing it.

Others argue PoliFact was bamboozled by Republican talking points and didn’t see reality. Steve Benen writes for Washington Monthly,

“Medicare is a single-payer health care system offering guaranteed benefits to seniors. The House Republican budget plan intends to do away with the existing system and replace it with something very different — a privatized voucher plan. It would still be called “Medicare,” but it wouldn’t be Medicare.

“It seems foolish to have to parse the meaning of the word “end,” but if there’s a program, and it’s replaced with a different program, proponents brought an end to the original program. That’s what the verb means.”

What about the $12,500 figure? PoliFact acknowledges that the number comes from an analysis by the Congressional budget Office. PoliFact argues that the number is misleading, however, because it includes the amount of premiums seniors already pay. “The CBO estimates beneficiaries would contribute about $6,150 in premiums in 2022 if the program isn’t changed at all. So the extra money seniors need to pay under the Republican proposal is more like $6,350.” Oh, good; the premium would only be more than doubled.

But that’s only in 2020. The Ryan plan provides for keeping increases in Medicare tied to the Gross National Product figure, which has not been rising nearly as fast as heath care cost. So the “difference” that seniors would have to pay would get bigger every year.

ATTEND ORGANIZING 2.0 by Charles Lenchner

Edited slightly:
You should attend Organizing 2.0 on May 10, 2011:

1. You work for an organization that does not use online tools except for some email and a low quality website. Join us for hands on training on relevant software, case studies on organizations in your situation, and suggestions for best next steps that even under-resourced groups can realistically take.

2. You work for an organization that pays for and uses online tools – just not very well. How can you make good use of what you are already paying for? Learn how to move from having an online presence, to using it effectively to achieve mission goals.

3. You work for an organization that uses online tools quite well – but only in specific pockets of your work. We’re bringing together experience labor and organizing professionals figuring out (together) what works best to win campaigns, serve members, and drive up individual engagement. Join us to learn – and to share your own knowledge.

Now for another question. Why are we doing this?

Our experience is that in many organizations the introduction of technology is disruptive. At various levels, from the top to the bottom, questions about what works and why are often suppressed out of ignorance, fear and uncertainty. The gap between status power and expertise often leads to situations where anyone who “knows” can’t decide, and anyone with enough power to decide almost certainly doesn’t “know” how to do online organizing. Exactly how many union presidents come with experience as digital strategists? How many new hires who are digital natives get to decide on budgets? We haven’t met ANY. And it shows. (We've got stories!)

Our solution is to organize. Our targets are the decision makers and front line staff of labor unions and community organizing groups fighting around economic justice issues. Victory for us means advancing an organizations’ effectiveness through the appropriate use of online technologies. We win when online organizers are hired with the power to implement real online organizing strategies, when the
right kind of consultants are consulted and heard, when resources are spent wisely, when risk averse institutions embrace experimentation.

It’s hard; many of us have to bite our tongues much of the time. If we were highly paid consultants we’d probably lose clients or put out a lot of creative ideas that are then ignored. We’re taking our available assets – expertise, community and autonomy – and using them as best we can. This is the one time a year where we get together to ‘tell it like it is.’

If you’re reading this and haven’t already embraced our vision, consider these questions:

* Are Organizing 2.0’s trainers coming from labor, community organizing groups and progressive political organizations?
Yes.

* Have they done this before?
Yes.

* Are important organizations endorsing and participating?
Yes.

* Is the labor movement in New York doing so well that we can afford to continue with business as usual?
NO.

http://www.organizing20.org/pgh/

Join Us for a Special Young Professionals Reception


The Heritage Foundation
Logo

You are Cordially Invited to Attend a

Reception and Discussion for Young Professionals

hosted by The Heritage Foundation,
Allegheny Institute for Public Policy and
Commonwealth Foundation for Public Policy Alternatives
featuring
Bill Beach
Director, Center for Data Analysis, The Heritage Foundation
and
Rob Bluey
Director, Center for Media and Public Policy, The Heritage Foundation
speaking on the topic of
Will Opportunity Keep Knocking?
How Government Policies Are Making It
Harder for You to Become Successful
Tuesday, May 17, 2011

6:30–9:00 p.m.          Reception
7:30 p.m.                 Remarks
Penn Brewery
800 Vinial Street
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Please RSVP by Tuesday, May 10, 2011.
Register today by clicking here.

There is no charge for this event.

Complimentary wine, drinks and hors d'oeuvres will be provided.

For more information, please contact Janine Brown.
Phone: (202) 608-1524
Fax: (202) 675-1778   
E-mail: mailto:specialevents@heritage.org?subject=Pittsburgh%20Young%20Professionals%20Event

The Heritage Foundation | 214 Massachusetts Ave. NE, Washington, D.C. 20002