Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Robust Debate. Really?

Humm.
WDUQ delay option is rare solution in public radio: "Mr. King, a Pittsburgh Foundation board member and co-director of the Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children's Media, said local foundations want to use media to generate robust debate about important issues such as reforming public schools, improving Pittsburgh's air quality and the environmental impact of drilling for natural gas.
Really?

They are putting their money where their mouths are, at least in this 'option.'

Mr. King, I'd be happy to do a 3-hour per week radio show on the new WDUQ. It will be called, "Take Your Mark." It will be robust and deal with all things Pittsburgh, as I and * see em. (The * is a wildcard in computer-speak / shell language that means anything and everything.)

With the necessary support, I'd be willing to host and manage a 3-hour show six days per week.


By the way, the Pittsburgh journalism scene is frail and often tilted to the side of being a tool for the nonprofit weenies, err, wonks. It is weak. The watchdogs have been in a deep slumber too often.

But, the way to counter that situation of a weak journalism infrastructure is to make our own. We are the watchdogs today.

Of course, there are times when they get it right, or they get it covered at all. When that happens, I cheer and let them know too.

WDUQ was a nice outlet. If it goes away, it will be missed. Honz, not so much, God bless his soul.

Let's talk about reforming Pittsburgh schools. Let's talk about raising our kids here. Let's talk about city hall politics. Let's talk about elections and have candidate debates -- before the smear campaigns begin. Let's talk about grass-roots issues and how to keep our city authentic. Let's talk about the bazaar and open source software solutions. Let's make wiki pages, on the air. Let's empower with social networking too.



WDUQ delay option is rare solution in public radio
Monday, May 10, 2010
By Marylynne Pitz and Adrian McCoy, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Last week's move by four Pittsburgh foundations to buy a 60-day option on the WDUQ-FM noncommercial license is "a bold, proactive form of philanthropy," said Maxwell King, former head of The Heinz Endowments.

Along with Grant Oliphant, president of The Pittsburgh Foundation, leaders of the Richard King Mellon Foundation, the Heinz Endowments and an anonymous foundation gave what amounts to hand money to Duquesne University, which put the noncommercial license up for sale late last year.

The foundations' option purchase delays for 60 days any sale of the noncommercial license for WDUQ, a news and jazz station that began operating in 1949. Duquesne University, which would like to get up to $10 million for the license and channel the funds into educational improvements, has received four bids. WDUQ-FM's format consists of National Public Radio news, jazz programs and local reporting.

Mr. Oliphant made it clear last week that he and his colleagues are not interested in owning a noncommercial radio license but merely to ensure the station's future.

Mr. King, a Pittsburgh Foundation board member and co-director of the Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children's Media, said local foundations want to use media to generate robust debate about important issues such as reforming public schools, improving Pittsburgh's air quality and the environmental impact of drilling for natural gas.

"The Marcellus Shale is going to have a huge impact on Western Pennsylvania," Mr. King said about gas drilling along the 95,000-square-mile formation that stretches over several states. "I don't think the public is very engaged in what the Marcellus Shale may mean to Western Pennsylvania."

Before leading the Heinz Endowments, Mr. King was editor of The Philadelphia Inquirer. He, like Mr. Oliphant, sees the sale of WDUQ as an opportunity to explore how to preserve public service journalism in the region.

"We've got some great newspaper journalism happening in Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh, compared to many other American cities, has a pretty robust journalism scene," Mr. King acknowledged.

But the question is, "How can the tools of information dissemination be made more effective at driving the public discourse in Pittsburgh? It makes complete sense for the Pittsburgh Foundation to be looking at how electronic media can be used to advance a dialogue."

Erik Langner, a lawyer and director of acquisitions for Public Radio Capital, a nonprofit that has handled more than $250 million in deals for public radio stations since 2001, said, "It is nearly unprecedented for a market of Pittsburgh's size to face the potential loss of its NPR news station."

Based in Boulder, Colo., the nonprofit helps preserve existing public radio signals and finds opportunities to expand public radio formats in new markets.

"There have been larger stations sold, but they've been done in a way where there was no risk that the format was going to change," he said.

While he has never seen four foundations take the step they did in Pittsburgh, it's quite common for philanthropies to play a key part in galvanizing communities to preserve public radio stations, he said.

In other deals, many foundations have been "critical, especially in the early stages, for funding and vision and building and preserving public radio services."

The foundations' purchase of a 60-day option on the license -- a period in which Duquesne University promises not to sell the station -- alters the landscape for all potential buyers.

"They bought us 60 days and any other potential bidder 60 days. We all feel that given the time to raise the money, we can," said Joe Kelly, president of the advisory board for Pittsburgh Public Media, a local nonprofit established to try to preserve DUQ's NPR and jazz format.

Asked whether the Pittsburgh Foundation will hold a public forum or town hall meeting to elicit community input, Mr. Oliphant said all the details of the process haven't yet been mapped out.

In the short term, the foundations have tapped Charlie Humphrey, executive director of Pittsburgh Filmmakers/Pittsburgh Center for the Arts and the Pittsburgh Glass Center, to develop a plan.

The most important question, Mr. Humphrey said, is, "What does the best news and information public radio station look like? It has to take into account what current listeners and potential listeners want. You can't create a top-down, authoritarian model."

Bridget Fare, a Duquesne University spokeswoman, said the school "agreed to the two-month period in which we won't negotiate or make decisions so that the foundations have an opportunity to put forth a bid. It's in Pittsburgh's -- and Duquesne's -- best interest to allow all interested parties ample opportunity. Other parties can submit proposals during the two-month period, but the university won't act on them.

"From the very beginning, we have understood the keen community interest in the station's future. We've worked closely with the Pittsburgh Foundation in engaging Public Radio Capital to explore ways to keep the format ... and so naturally when they, along with the other foundations, came forward, we agreed to give them time.

"Hopefully a proposal will result that will address the community's desire to keep the format, while at the same time recognizing Duquesne's obligation in ensuring the maximum benefit for our students."

Marylynne Pitz: mpitz@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1648. Adrian McCoy: amccoy@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1865.


Read more: http://post-gazette.com/pg/10130/1056572-28.stm?cmpid=newspanel0#ixzz0nX1yKSKa

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Root for America

Sent in an email, in part:
Obama and his regime have created a vast and rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big government; a vast privileged class of public employees who work for big government; and a government dedicated to destroying capitalism and installing themselves as socialist rulers by OVERWHELMING THE SYSTEM.

My God...Add it up and you've got the perfect scheme.

Only one thing stands in their way - you and me, the American taxpayers. If we want to save the greatest country and economic system in world history, we had better get busy. We had better fight back hard. Our children and grandchildren's futures are at stake. And please don't assume the GOP is the answer. They had their chance. Bush spent irresponsibly; Bush never vetoed a single spending bill; Bush supported bailouts, earmarks and stimulus; Bush was responsible for the Medicare expansion; Bush spent a trillion dollars on two never-ending wars; Bush was the disaster that opened the door for Obama.

The answer is to support true fiscal conservatives who understand that national debt is the real global threat to our survival. Libertarians who truly support economic freedom are the real Tea Party candidates who want to truly change "business as usual" in Washington D.C. Libertarians don't just talk the talk- we walk the walk. On November 2nd let's throw every incumbent in Congress out (with a few exceptions like Ron Paul)...and if the new class let's us down...let's throw them all out again in 2012. Eventually they'll get the message- the citizens are in charge.

Wayne Allyn Root was the 2008 Libertarian Vice Presidential candidate. His new book is entitled, "The Conscience of a Libertarian: Empowering the Citizen Revolution with God, Guns, Gambling & Tax Cuts." For more information on Wayne, please visit Wayne's web site at: ROOTforAmerica.com.
Full email in comments.

Monday, May 10, 2010

City public safety director questioned on snow response

Director, what's up with that?

City public safety director questioned on snow response: "'I was so disheartened, Director Huss, when you did not respond to any of the seven invitations,' she said after calling him to council's table. 'It's this total lack of communication that is concerning to me.'"
Like I'm going to get a reply and she won't.

Flood of PPS Building Permits forthcoming from Mark Rauterkus for summer and fall at Reizenstein

From Frick-swim

Hi All,

I'm putting in nearly a dozen different PPS Building permits this week. It is sure to open a few conversations about spring, summer and fall programs that can flourish at Pgh Obama with aquatics, water polo and beyond. I look forward to these conversations in the weeks ahead. Thanks for your help and insights.


Permit Summary for use of PPS facilities from Mark Rauterkus and others

Title Working name and specifics

SATURDAYS:

4H.CLOH.Org Saturday Swim School in Summer
July 10 to Aug 28, 2010 on Saturdays from 8 am to 1:30 pm


4H.CLOH.Org Saturday swim school in fall 2010
September 4 to December 19, 2010 on Saturdays from 8 am to 1:30 pm


MOVIE NIGHT with CITIPARKS:

4H.CLOH.Org WED night Flick & Float w Gym
June 23, 2010 to Aug 25 on WEDNESDAYS from 6 pm to 10:00 pm
* Partnership with Citiparks is NOT yet formalized.
* If movies are shown outside, we might need to move the end time slightly (11 pm?) based on length of movie.
* Includes the outdoor field for movie screen (weather permitting).
* Includes the GYM.


CAMP, CONDITIONING and CLINIC Nights in Summer:

4H.CLOH.Org Community PM practices on Summer Nights
June 14, 2010 to Aug 13, 2010 on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays from 6:00 pm to 10:00 pm
Includes the GYM for basketball and volleyball play.


SUMMER Days:

4H.CLOH.Org Community Swim with Summer Dreamers time slot
July 12, 2010 to Aug 13, 2010 on Monday to Friday from 10:30 am to 1:00 pm
* in building with PPS Summer Dreamers.


WATER POLO Season:

Schenley Water Polo (early season)
Aug 16, 2010 to first day of school for 2010 year on M, T, W, Th, F from 8 am to 4 pm


Schenley Water Polo (in season)
Sept 1 to Nov 18, 2010 on school days from 3:00 pm to 5:30 pm


Schenley Water Polo and AM Swimming
Sept 1 to Nov 18, 2010 on school days from 6:00 AM to 7:30 AM.
For high school and middle school athletes.

--
Thanks again.


Mark Rauterkus Mark.Rauterkus@gmail.com
Swimming and Water Polo Coach, Schenley High School, Pittsburgh, PA
http://CLOH.wikia.com
412 298 3432 = cell

Letters to the editor from S is off the mark

The LTE says:
Letters to the editor: "We must develop a strategy to draw employers to the region that will capitalize on the area's work force and offer employment opportunities aligned with the level of skill and education of job seekers. It's time we put those degrees to work."

Think again.

The 'draw employers here' part is often a jump start to 'grow governement' solutions.

I am less inclined to 'attract others here' and would rather welcome the 'do-it-ourselves' approach. We need to do it with what we have here now. Grow our own would work much better.

Furthermore, the 'attract others' is at its base a 'bribe.' It could be gov money or not. But, it is a 'trick' or a 'pass' to do more gratis for them or have them do less than they should. Forget that. I don't want to 'bribe' as a 'strategy.'

Those who would take bribes (i.e., Nordstrum and Lord & Taylor and Lazarus perhaps) are not types that we desire for long-term sustainability. Moreover, to pay Peter robs Paul -- and that strategy puts poison into the shared well of our free marketplace. None are inclined to compete with them then. Hence, fewer are interested in starting new business and risking their capital here.

In the end we might have a great workforce, big governement, another chapter of new stategy in the wings, yet few employers, few new biz owners, fewer emerging companies, fewer jobs.

Smart people, hard workers and trainable individuals (we got em) can figure out how to hatch, start, open and operate new business ventures to make value and wealth and prosperity, without bribes.

To cook, cut, fix or drill are just part of the lessons we need to teach. To vision, manage and account are others that can't be ignored any longer.

Sunday, May 09, 2010

Not easy being a three-sport athlete at a large high school

Hey Mike White. It doesn't take a deaf ear to be a three sport athlete.
Not easy being a three-sport athlete at a large high school
It takes plenty of hard work, good time management, multi-tasking skills and supportive coaches and parents. But also, and maybe most importantly, it takes a deaf ear to be a three-sport athlete.
Perhaps it takes a to be a sports journalist at the Post Gazette.

Come now.

I've got a better story. We've got three athletes at Schenley that are three sport athletes and every team they played on have won (knock on wood) a City Championship. Jan, Christopher and Martin are soccer players, swimmers and volleyball players. The volleyball season isn't over, but Schenley should win that title too.

Saturday, May 08, 2010

Council, mayor and library disagree over funds

Council, mayor and library disagree over funds: "On Jan. 22, though, someone went into the city accounting system and deleted the funds.
'The entire code account for the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh has disappeared,' said council finance chairman William Peduto, who questioned the legality of the change. 'City code requires any budget amendments to be made by council. It cannot be done by a bureaucrat or the mayor.'"

Friday, May 07, 2010

Swiftboating scum point at Rand in Kentucky.

The American Future Fund seems to be a little less clean than the Gulf of Mexico near the sunk oil rig.

Ron Paul wrote and email:
It looks like the establishment is really desperate to keep my son Rand out of the Senate. Dick Cheney, Rudy Giuliani and Rick Santorum were already backing his opponent. And, as you probably know, Senator Mitch McConnell joined the party this week and endorsed Rand's establishment-backed opponent Trey Grayson. Senator McConnell is now doing TV ads for Grayson statewide.


But it gets far, far worse than that. That's why I'm writing you this urgent email today.

They're trying to "Swift Boat" Rand.
That's right, the shadowy groups that seem to come out whenever the establishment is threatened are here. They're on the ground in Kentucky. They're going on the air today with a HUGE six figure buy of THIS attack ad.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MePZmyK96tI


The ad is meant to sabotage Rand. And they have the money to do it.


So far, the group has put over $100,000 on the air. But that's a drop in the bucket for them. The last time the group came into a state, they dropped over $1 million dollars.


You and I simply must help Rand fight back. This is a do or die moment for his campaign.
He has been able to match Grayson and his allies up to now, and it's why he's winning. But now, they've opened a new front, and Rand must be able to respond.


But without your help today, everything we've worked for so far could be undone by these shadowy, special-interest backed groups.
Please answer the call to action today by donating to Rand's campaign. There are only 11 days left, and he desperately needs your help.
In Liberty,


Ron Paul
P.S. In case you need more convincing that these groups are the establishment and are serious: Their "leadership" team? Grayson's POLLSTER and his MEDIA TEAM. This is nothing less than a clear attempt by Grayson to skirt the law and trash Rand anonymously. YOU AND I CANNOT LET HIM GET AWAY WITH THIS OUTRAGE! Please click HERE to donate to Rand's campaign and help him fight back!
Watch yourself:



Read the comments on YouTube. I called and left a message: "coo coo..."

Jake Wheatley on Pensions, Privatizing and Parking Chairs

Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®


From: Lady Elaine <lady_elaine68@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 04:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
To: Lady Elaine<lady_elaine68@yahoo.com>
Subject: Jake Wheatley on Pensions, Privatizing and Parking Chairs



Check out State Representative Jake Wheatley and his answers to View from the Burgh Chair's candidate questionnaire as he asks voters to return him to the seat.  Teacher's pensions?  Yeah, you could say he has a few words on that.  And boy does he look good in a suit . . . 

Click here and read all about him:  

Lady Elaine
Blogress

Thursday, May 06, 2010

Fw: National Coach Survey Partners With Inst. For Sports Analytics

Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®


From: John Kelly <jkelly@nationalcoachsurvey.org>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 18:14:58 -0400
To: <mark@rauterkus.com>
Subject: National Coach Survey Partners With Inst. For Sports Analytics

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
For more information contact:
John Kelly, Director National Coach Survey
JKelly@NationalCoachSurvey.org     (917) 648-8391
 
Athletic Coaches Have a Profound Impact
on the Lives of Young Athletes
Survey of thousands of US travel coaches reports that nearly all are asked for
non-sports related advice by their players
 
April 20, 2010 Goldens Bridge, NY—Athletic coaches have a tremendous impact on the lives of their young athletes, according to a poll taken by the National Coach Survey (NCS).   In a survey taken by more than 1,000 travel sports coaches in the first two weeks of April, coaches responded that more than 80% have been asked by parents to speak to their children about non-sport issues.  Nearly 90% say that their players seek advice about non-sports issues, such as problems with friends, schoolwork or family issues.
 
In a typical in season week, a third of the coaches polled said that they spend more than 16 hours with their athletes.  Nearly all of the coaches said reported they council their players on nutrition or off-season training, apart from games and practices.  When asked what the most important lesson they wanted to teach their athletes, 40% replied “hard work,” 30% replied integrity, 20% teamwork and 10% said sportsmanship.  Winning was not mentioned
 
"You can see from these numbers just how important coaches can be to the development and choices that young athletes make, especially at the travel sports level," said John Kelly, Publisher of NationalCoachSurvey.org. "Our research shows that coaches often rank equal to, and in some cases higher than, parents in terms of influencing the decisions young people make on and off the field. I don’t think the general public has any idea about the level of their influence."
 
The National Coach Survey focuses on exploring the issues facing our nation’s athletic coaches and the impact they have on our society.  Twice a month, NCS distributes a new survey on topics that relate directly to how coaches impact and improve the lives of the young athletes they work with so closely.   Full results of this survey can be found at www.NationalCoachSurvey.org
 
The National Coach Survey is managed by My Sports Dreams, a leading provider of product-less solutions to financial challenges faced by teams at the collegiate, interscholastic and travel levels nationwide.  For more information, visit www.mysportsdreams.com.

 

John Kelly
Publisher
NationalCoachSurvey.org
57 Todd Hill Circle
Goldens Bridge, NY 10526
www.NationalCoachSurvey.org
JKelly@NationalCoachSurvey.org

 

 



--
To unsubscribe from this list visit this link

Julian Heicklen to be in Pittsburgh Wednesday May 12th, leafleting

Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®


From: "HaroldK" <htk@pitt.edu>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 21:58:19 -0000
To: <PghLibertarians@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: lppgh: Julian Heicklen to be in Pittsburgh Wednesday May 12th, leafleting

 

He's planning on doing Fully Informed Jury Association leafleting in front of the U.S. District Courthouse, from 11:45am until 1:15pm, or to when he gets arrested. (See http://fija.org/ .)

It's part of an 8 courthouse "circuit" he's making. It seems he already has one or more people scheduled to leaflet with him here. But, no doubt he'd be delighted to have some of the regulars he has met here in Pittsburgh over the years join him in the endeavor, if not in being arrested. (Bring your camcorders or camera-phones.)

I'm not sure if he has notified the local news media, or los federales, of his intentions. I'll inquire.

Here's some of the message he sent me:

The circuit is the 8 courthouses I expect to visit from May 10–14. I have accomplices committed for 7 of those courthouses so far. Only in Johnstown do I not have a commitment from anyone.

So far I have distributed literature 9 times at the Manhattan, NY courthouse (8 arrests), twice in Philadelphia, and once in Fort Lauderdale, FL.

See you next Wednesday—Julian

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
We are doing our best to provide a quality service for Western PA Libertarians and those interested.  Hence, the moderator appreciates any feedback about this list, including reasons for unsubscribing. Reply to libertarian@ernharth.com.

Thanks
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

USA Swimming cares about Duquesne University's cutting of men's swimming

USA Swimming - Coaches: "'Go for 5' to help threatened college swimming programs (5/4/2010)


Over the last 5 years, 46 Division I men’s teams have been cut for funding and Title IX reasons. Once comprising over 65% of the Division I teams, men’s teams now only comprise 40% of member associations. Divisions II and III have also experienced cuts.

In an attempt to halt the deterioration of college swimming nationwide, the Duquesne men’s swimming team, parents, alumni and students have developed the “Go for 5” initiative, a campaign designed to save one program at a time, starting with the Duquesne men’s team.

Endorsed by the College Sports Council and the College Swimming Coaches Association, the Gofor5.org program goal is to reach one million people with a request to donate money in the increments of $5. The money raised will go to threatened programs around the country."

Swim Tip on Streamline

Fwd: Policy Brief: "Most Livable" a Dubious and Fleeting Honor

From: Allegheny Institute




Policy Brief

An electronic publication of

The Allegheny Institute for Public Policy



May 6, 2010                                                                                                     Volume 10, Number 24






  "Most Livable" a Dubious and Fleeting Honor


Quick—who did Forbes magazine recently name as its "Most Livable City"?  Unless one has been under a rock in southwestern Pennsylvania they would know that Pittsburgh was crowned with the honor. 

The City—more accurately, the seven county metropolitan statistical area from which data was extracted and compared to other metro areas—has now been named "most livable" by three separate publications since spring of 2007.  Forbes' insistence on calling metro areas cities is terribly misleading and not worthy of the magazine.  This is especially true in the case of Pittsburgh where the City's population accounts for about 13 percent of the metro population.  That's compared to the Allegheny Institute Benchmark City average of 40 percent. 

But which place was bestowed with the Forbes number one title last year?  That is probably not on the tips of many people's tongues. The answer is Portland, ME. A review of the 2009 most livable list and the 2010 rankings (as much as are available, as Forbes' website  presents slides for only the top ten or fifteen metro areas) shows that Portland  dropped out of the 2010 top ten entirely.  The same fate was shared by three others in the top five for 2009 (Bethesda, Des Moines, and Tulsa).  Only the metro area comprising Stamford, CT managed to retain its place in the top performers, dropping from fourth place to ninth. 

This year Pittsburgh, along with two Utah places (Ogden and Provo), Ann Arbor, MI, and our own state capital comprised the top five most livable.

So how does one account for the fact that—in one year's time—Forbes has put together a new top five with all of last year's cream of the crop failing to stay in the top five while last year's tenth place finisher  jumped to number one? The ranking's volatility from year to year suggests a not very well thought out methodology. After all if the most livable  cannot stay in the top ten for a year after being so designated, what is the point of naming a number one in the first place? 

Consider the disappointment of someone who decided to act on the belief that the Portland ranking was accurate and moved there only to see the ranking drop dramatically by the next spring. Consider too, the poor Chamber of Commerce in Portland. What does it do after a year of touting itself as the number one livable city only to find themselves now not even in the top ten?  How do they explain the drop without saying either (a) their city has undergone a massive twelve month decline in its economy and quality of life or (b) that the Forbes ranking methodology stinks? And by so doing demonstrate their own gullibility and unsavory tendency to engage in empty braggadocio. What a dilemma.

There do not appear to be major changes in the measure used by Forbes to determine livability.  They collect current unemployment rate, five-year income growth, crime rates, a cultural index, and cost of living from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Moody's, Sperling's art and leisure index, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  One thing that did change is the size of the sample.  In 2009, 379 metropolitan areas were evaluated.  This year the magazine used only the largest 200. 

Pittsburgh's Livability Measure Rankings,
2009 and 2010
2009
Top Third
(1-126)
Middle Third
(127-253)
Bottom Third
(254-379)
2010
Top Third (1-66)
Middle Third (67-133)
Bottom Third (134-200)
Income Growth


269
Income Growth
20


Cost of Living

147

Cost of Living
52


Culture
37


Culture
26


Crime
45


Crime
15


Unemployment Rate
48


Unemployment Rate

73


Pittsburgh has always received good marks on cultural attractions and overall crime rate, even though in the case of the former some of the venues are used by relatively few people and on the latter there are areas of high crime.  And in the 2009 and 2010 Forbes rankings those good marks are reflected: in 2009, Pittsburgh ranked 37th out of 379 on culture and 45th out of 379 on crime.  This year the rankings were 26th and 15th out of 200, respectively.  So it is fair to say that Pittsburgh was in the top third of the sample cases on both indicators.

The table above divides the sample cases from the last two years into thirds to show how shrinking the number of metros affected Pittsburgh on livability measures.  As pointed out, crime and culture stayed relatively the same, but income growth (measured by Forbes as the average of the last five years) shot up from 269th to 20th.  By the way, faster income growth means relatively faster or did not fall as much. It could be every area actually had negative growth, some more than others.

Instead of being behind 268 other metros on income growth Forbes is arguing that this year only 19 are greater.  Cost of living ranking for Pittsburgh likewise moved up and while the unemployment rate ranking fell from 48th to 73rd, Pittsburgh found itself with four rankings in the top third this year and none in the bottom third, unlike 2009.

A basic problem with the rankings is that a long term slow growth area such as the Pittsburgh region—where there has been no net gain in private sector jobs for ten years and had very slow growth prior to the recession—can weather downturns better because there was no construction boom to unwind and the industry mix has shifted very far away from goods production to service production. 

Another problem is that, to a large degree, livability is a subjective concept.  For some, being close to relatives and long time friends trumps everything except perhaps the complete inability to earn a decent income. For others with children, the schools will be very important. Then there are those who put great stock in culture and still others who enjoy the outdoors, great scenery and so on.
 
Then there are the aggravations of life that Forbes does not take into account sufficiently.  How about traffic problems, high property taxes, incompetent public officials, financial conditions of the core city, labor strife, poor street maintenance and inept snow removal?     

Still, however flawed the latest rankings are, City officials and boosters are quick to make a big deal of the ranking. And why not?  Forbes' report talks almost exclusively about the City, its universities and cultural offerings and how it is no longer a smoky city. Could someone tell these ranking writers that Pittsburgh has not been smoky for 20 years at least? It is past time for a new cliché.

Here's a question. Why have we not seen a gaggle of elected officials from around the metro area standing up to take a share of the credit and accolades? It is a metro wide honor, after all. 

And a final question. After all the ill conceived and much ballyhooed rankings over the years, does anyone (other than boosters and officials) put any credence in these rankings?



Jake Haulk, Ph.D., President                                                        Eric Montarti, Senior Policy Analyst




For updates and commentary on daily issues please visit our blog at alleghenyinstitute.org/blog.

If you have enjoyed reading this Policy Brief and would like to send it to a friend, please feel free to forward it to them.

For more information on this and other topics, please visit our web site: alleghenyinstitute.org

If you wish to support our efforts please consider becoming a donor to the Allegheny Institute.  The Allegheny Institute is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization and all contributions are tax deductible.  Please mail your contribution to: 

The Allegheny Institute
305 Mt. Lebanon Boulevard
Suite 208
Pittsburgh, PA  15234

Save Mellon Arena Petition

Sign a petition:
Save Mellon Arena
Petition
: "To: City Of Pittsburgh
We, the undersigned, request
that the Civic Arena (now known as Mellon Arena) be declared a historical
landmark."

Wednesday, May 05, 2010

Fwd: Help Stop a Tax Increase in Pennsylvania!

From: Tom Schatz, President ccagw.org
The Council for Citizens Against Government Waste - Action Alert

We urgently need your help today to stop a tax increase in
Pennsylvania. Please tell Governor Ed Rendell and your state
senator and representative to cut wasteful and unnecessary spending
FIRST before enacting any new taxes.
http://membership.cagw.org/site/R?i=aq1TmdAl2p3fusz1iQ4z9g..
In order to eliminate a projected shortfall of at least $500 million
in the General Fund, Governor Rendell has proposed a $29 billion
budget for 2010-11 that increases business taxes, imposes new taxes on
natural gas and tobacco products, and expands the sales tax to include
many goods and services currently exempt.

With Pennsylvania, like the rest of the country, still facing one of
the toughest economies in decades, your state politicians should be
working to relieve the financial burden on cash-strapped families and
pursuing policies that encourage, rather than discourage, economic
activity and investment!

Pennsylvania already has the highest Corporate Net Income Tax rate in
the world, at 41.5 percent (when both federal and state taxes are
counted). As a result, the state ranks 45th in the nation in job
growth since 1990. The governor's proposal for combined
reporting of taxable income by corporations and their subsidiaries,
regardless of whether they have operations in Pennsylvania, will only
further burden businesses, discouraging local investment and driving
employers and jobs to other states.

One area of growth for the state economy has been the natural gas
industry, which had created an estimated 29,000 jobs by 2008 and is
projected to generate another 98,000 jobs in 2010. However, the
governor's proposed severance tax on natural gas companies
--which already pay Pennsylvania's Corporate Net Income Tax,
Capital Stock and Franchise Tax, leasing fees, and royalty payments --
would discourage further investment in this boom industry, reducing
in-state drilling activity by at least 30 percent, according to one
estimate.

While Governor Rendell's budget proposes reducing the Sales and
Use Tax rate from 6 to 4 percent, it would expand the tax to cover a
whole host of new goods and services, including advertising, truck
transportation, and business services, with the net effect that
Pennsylvanians would pay an estimated $531 million more in sales taxes
next fiscal year.

What's more, the governor's proposed taxes on smokeless
tobacco and cigars will not only hurt Pennsylvania's small
tobacco farmers, another growth industry, these taxes are also
unlikely to hit projected revenue targets. Of the 57 excise tax
increases that states implemented between 2003 and 2007, only 16 met
or exceeded revenue targets. As just one example, when New
Jersey increased its cigarette excise tax in 2006, instead of gaining
a projected $30 million in revenue, the state lost more than $22
million, as smokers moved to purchasecigarettes across state
lines, or through untaxed or lower-tax venues, such as Native American
territories and the Internet.

In addition, tobacco taxes are regressive, disproportionately
impacting the poor and those living on fixed incomes. With many
Pennsylvanians struggling to make ends meet, no taxpayer --
particularly not those most disadvantaged -- should be forced to hand
over more of his or her hard-earned money to the government!

Governor Rendell has proposed massive spending increases in each of his
budgets, usually requiring new or higher taxes, while state lawmakers
have consistently splurged in "good" years, making them
unprepared for economic downturns.

Citizens Against Government Waste's and The Commonwealth
Foundation for Public Policy Alternatives' 2006 Pennsylvania
Piglet Book identified $8 billion in potential savings over two years
from the elimination of inefficient, duplicative, and extravagant
spending -- more than enough to balance the budget. The
Pennsylvania Senate's newly approved bipartisan spending cuts
commission should adopt the Piglet Book's recommendations, and
Governor Rendell and your state legislators should follow the example
of households across the country in these tough economic times by
eliminating such wasteful and non-essential spending.

Tell Governor Rendell and your state senator and representative today
to forego raising any taxes and instead cut spending!
http://membership.cagw.org/site/R?i=cBL2Sj_tgyZ5SYwrMMDd0g..
Sincerely,
Thomas A. Schatz
President, The Council for Citizens Against Government Waste (CCAGW) is the
lobbying arm of Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW), the nation's

The CAGW is largest taxpayer watchdog organization with more than one million
members and supporters nationwide. CCAGW is a 501(c)(4)
nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that lobbies for legislation to
eliminate waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement in government.
Contributions to CCAGW are not tax-deductible for federal income tax
purposes. For more information about CCAGW, visit
www.ccagw.org.http://membership.cagw.org/site/R?i=1Sa00tVqLVq4aIy_2ojiGA..
Make a contribution today to help CCAGW wage and win this battle
against higher taxes

http://membership.cagw.org/site/R?i=MgiLv7f3PTrRoB5fJuWdzQ..

Pennsylvania's 12th congressional district special election, 2010 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pennsylvania's 12th congressional district special election, 2010 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


House race has 3rd hopeful » Local News » The Tribune Democrat, Johnstown, PA: "JOHNSTOWN — By now, many voters have heard about Critz and Burns battling for the 12th Congressional District.

But what about Agoris?

That would be Demo Agoris, a Washington County Libertarian who will be the third candidate listed on the May 18 special-election ballot that will determine who fills the unexpired term of the late U.S. Rep. John Murtha.

Agoris knows he doesn’t have a big chance for success against Democrat Mark Critz and Republican Tim Burns. But he is trying to spread his message of “less government, more freedom and less taxes” as far as possible.

“I believe that it should be ‘power to the people,’ ” Agoris said."



CSPAN on tonight's debate (with interview with tonight's co-moderator) that should air Saturday at 8PM (according to one article)
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/293328-5
the debate itself will be posted here when it airs:
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/293340-1

The tribune-democrat also lists Demo here:
http://tribune-democrat.com/local/x1036627811/Special-election-hopefuls-will-square-off-tonight

Unfortunately, the LP is ignored here:
http://tribune-democrat.com/local/x1612548710/12th-district-candidates-forums-planned

We'll see how Demo does against the 2% projected here...people are pretty fed up with the status quo:
http://www.pa2010.com/2010/05/internal-poll-has-critz-up-by-8/

Wannstedt: Pitt to Big Ten "a lot of rumors"

Just this past year the PIAA put an extra week into the fall season for football.
Wannstedt: Pitt to Big Ten "a lot of rumors": "Wannstedt and Paterno talked to reporters Wednesday at the Lasch Football Building after meeting with the representatives from the Pennsylvania State Football Coaches Association's executive board. They both pledged their support for a plan to petition the PIAA to allow spring football practice in Pennsylvania.
I'm not so excited about more head crunching for young men. I bet another group that will be supporting the extension of high school football is the Ortho Docs.

Title IX talk on a message board

From Beijing 2008
A women posted on a public discussion board some keen insights.
It is a common misconception that NCAA football programs generate revenue for schools. In fact, a recent study by the NCAA reports that only about 20% of D1 programs operate in the black. The average net revenue lost is $10 million per school. So, how to justify supporting 85 scholarships for football programs?

This is the original wording of Title IX; how have we gotten to "sports dollars must reflect the proportion of men and women"?

No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.

I am a product of the original Title IX; I swam on a men's team in high school and played waterpolo on a men's team in college. There were no comparable women's teams, Title IX gave me the opportunity to compete. I was shut out from some activities; the organizers of the Empire State Games would not let me compete with my waterpolo team. They told me I could create my own team and find women to play against. Since there were not many women (in fact, I knew none) playing polo in New York in the 70s, I was relegated to the sidelines.

My support for Title IX does not extend to the current interpretation. By wiping out virtually all men's sports except football and basketball, it does not serve its intended purpose. Title IX was enacted to give those who wanted to be involved in a sport, the opportunity to play.

Pitt's "Race in America: Restructuring Inequality Conference" - June 3-6, 2010

The University of Pittsburgh's School of Social Work and its Center on Race and Social Problems will host this solution-focused national conference. Seven key areas will be explored during "Race in America":
  • economics,
  • education,
  • criminal justice,
  • race relations,
  • health,
  • mental health, and
  • families, youth, and the elderly.
There will be several evening events that are free to the public, as well as twenty sessions for registered conference participants. For more information or to register online, check out http://www.race.pitt.edu/.

Carnegie Library Community Planning Workshops

The Carnegie Libraries of Pittsburgh will be holding a series of community workshops over the next 6 months to discuss what can be done to ensure that Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh remains operationally and financially healthy. The "kick off" set of workshops will be held on May 15, 16, and 17. You may attend any or all of the workshops. Pre-registration is not required. For more information about the workshops, please visit http://www.carnegielibrary.org/future  or contact Maggie McFalls, at: feedback@carnegielibrary.org  or by phone at 412.622.8877.

I'm a pepper, you're a pepper, he's a pepper!

Penguins sign Dr. Pepper Snapple Group for Consol Energy Center - Pittsburgh Business Times:: "Penguins sign Dr. Pepper Snapple Group for Consol Energy Center"
Pittsburgh feels a little bit like Waco, Texas, today.

Nomination Papers for Libertarian Candidate(s) in PA.

It is time once again for our signature drive to get our candidates on the November Ballot! This year, the number of signatures required to get our statewide candidates on the ballot is 19,082, which is lower than it has been for many years. We hope to reach that goal with an all-volunteer effort, so we need everyone's help to gather signatures.
A great opportunity to gather signatures is if you can take advantage of some time during Primary Election Day on May 18. Primary Day is good because you know all of the voters going to the polls are registered voters and you know which district they live in. We will be collecting signatures through July. There is information below about how to get nomination papers, instructions for printing and filling them out, finding the distrct candidates for your area, and what to do when you are done below.

Getting our candidates on the ballot is important not only to get our message out and give voters choices that they would not have, but it allows us the opprortunity to maintain our party status with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Because of this status, we are able to participate in special elections that would otherwise be very difficult for our candidates to gain ballot access.

Last year we were able to have a candidate on the ballot in a statewide judicial race, which is the first time the Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania has ever done so. It was the first time there had been any alternatative party candidate in a statewide judicial race in Pennsylvania since 1993. This year we have a candidate on the ballot in the special election to fill the Congressional seat of the late John Murtha. There have also been state legislative seats and local races open to us because of the party status.

If you have any questions about nomination papers or would like printed papers sent to you, please contact Susan of our Election Committee; susan.haythornthwaite@lppa.org or election@lppa.org, and she will see that you get what you need. If you would like to print the forms yourself there are instructions available here:
www.lppa.org/happenings/elections/2010-nomination-papers.html

The nomination paper itself, with the statewide candidate information is available here:
www.lppa.org/documents/election/2010/2010_nomination_paper.pdf

A basic overview of the signature gathering process and where to send the form when done is here:
www.lppa.org/documents/election/2010/nomination_paper_guide_2010.pdf

Candidate information for all candidates, including district candidates to add on nomination papers is included here:
www.lppa.org/happenings/elections/2010-candidates.html

To find which districts you live in or which areas are included in Congressional and state legislative election districts you can look at the last reapportionment plan here:
www.dos.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/reapportionment_plans/12728

Thank you for all of your efforts to support the Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania!

Without your help, we would not be able to offer voters a real choice of greater individual liberty, personal responsibility, and limited government.

Sincerely,
Michael J. "Mik" Robertson
Chair, Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania