The Pitt News - Another Democrat favored to win Pittsburgh mayor Pittsburgh residents probably won’t find many reasons to get out and vote today in an election that appears to have been over before the polling places opened.
Associate Dean of Pitt’s Graduate School of Public and International Affairs Dr. David Miller said that voter turnout in Allegheny County is expected to be low because of relative apathy and a lack of public discussion.
Tuesday, November 08, 2005
No vote, then no hope.
Why bother voting in local elections? That is why people will not vote. I will say I never missed an election in my life, but I don't think I am going to go vote today, this is pittsburgh, and we know who will win. If there were any issues, state or federal elections I would vote, but for local elections my vote means about as much as a snow ball in h***.You should vote or else you'll be 'branded' as 'brainwashed.'
I don't see any point in voting this year.
Vote because we need a "NO vote" from you twice so as to make history. Say "NO" to the PA Supreme Court Justices on the retention votes.
We have a city of 300,000 people and around 30,000+/- are going to choose to vote for Bob O'Connor. If 90% of the people stay home and don't choose the mayor. The Republican (and I know that the above emmail came from a Republican) can win if 90-percent of the Republicans in the city came out and voted for the Republican.
Vote because Americans are fighting for the rights of others around the world to vote -- and we should do so here at home. Vote for the duty of citizenship because it is a lot less of a burden than service in the armed forces. Because those in the service answer their call -- we should vote to answer our call as well, with them in mind.
Voting is a great way to resolve issues and deal with problems. We solve conflicts -- with peace -- with votes. There's hope with voting. That reason is enough to convince others to vote rather than picking up a rock (or worse) and bashing it around in frustration.
Teachers strike -- and health coverage gets NUKED. Meanwhile Dad's in the ICU with his baby....
Oh my gosh.
Penn-Trafford board accepts teachers' offer to return to work... Striking teachers who tried to use their health benefits last weekend found out they didn't have any... Health benefits for members of the teachers union had been cut off...
... The lack of health benefits affects all of the teachers, but especially those who are pregnant and one whose wife delivered a son nine weeks premature. He is in the neo-natal intensive care unit at Magee-Womens Hospital... His father found out Friday his insurance was canceled.... The tactic is legal.
What would Bob Do -- not Bob O'Connor, but Bob Casey.
The Pennacchio for Pennsylvania email from November 8, 2005, was interesting. It has spunk. He needs it. Our community needs leaders with the right kind of spunk as well. Pennacchio is a Dem who is gearing up to run against Santorum for US Senate in 2006. But, he'll need to be the big boy from his own party, Bob Casey, to get a whack at PA's Junior Senator, the guy most in Western PA love to hate. Well, here is the email, reposted here.
Note, I post a lot of info at the blog. Some I like and agree with -- other times is is just for everyone's awareness. I don't have much to say about the candidates for the US Senate race -- yet. So, don't fly off and think that this posting is an 'endorsement.' Rather, it is a good sign of spunk in a place and time when we need it.
Note, I post a lot of info at the blog. Some I like and agree with -- other times is is just for everyone's awareness. I don't have much to say about the candidates for the US Senate race -- yet. So, don't fly off and think that this posting is an 'endorsement.' Rather, it is a good sign of spunk in a place and time when we need it.
The Congressional Quarterly is reporting that Bob Casey, Jr. has agreed to meet a challenge issued by Rick Santorum's campaign to say "how he would vote on the important issues before the United States Senate." Hey, when they're right, they're right; and it isn't often so let's not discourage them. Santorum's campaign has asked for Casey's position on twenty-two issues. Given Mr. Casey's refusal to address any issue of substance publicly, we'd settle for two.
Living Wage: Chuck supports a living wage; Rick Santorum opposes it. Where does Bob Casey stand? One out of five American children lives in poverty. Last year, 1 in 10 Pennsylvania households experienced food insecurity. 1.38 million Pennsylvanians have no health insurance. The majority of these citizens are employed or from working families. In 1968, the federal minimum wage was 86% of the poverty level. Today, it is 64%. Business interests have predicted disaster every time the minimum wage was raised. It has never happened. Legislators' wages are cost-adjusted; government benefits are cost-adjusted. Where does Bob Casey stand on a living wage for workers?
Alito Nomination: Judge Samuel Alito voted to overturn the Family and Medical Leave Act passed by Congress, upheld the strip search of a woman and a ten year old girl based on a warrant to search a man and his house, and ruled that the government could force a woman to notify her spouse before seeking an abortion -- with no exception for abuse or estrangement -- in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA v. Casey. Judge Alito is more concerned with business interests than with the freedom of citizens, especially women and minorities. Chuck opposes Judge Alito's confirmation; Rick Santorum supports it. What would Bob Casey, Jr. do?
If you agree with Chuck on living wage legislation and the Alito nomination, help us take the fight to the US Senate. Someone once said if you want to keep gettin' what you're gettin', keep doin' what you're doin.' If we keep electing the same kinds of politicians, politicians who are indebted to corporate interests, we're going to get the same old non-solutions that keep monied interests happy and the rest of us struggling. You can change politics by backing candidates who refuse corporate money and influence. Chuck doesn't take any PAC money; Casey and Santorum do -- lots of it.
gel button "contribute"
Thanks for your support, and for taking time today to vote. The polls open at 7AM and close at 8PM.
Pennacchio for Pennsylvania
The Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: Final Thoughts on the 2005 Pittsburgh General Election
I put a different spin on today's election at another blog. Go there and see his posting and then my comments (also posted below).
I wrote on his blog:
No, no, no....
I dare say you are close on some of your assumptions, but the final step to close the thought is missing...
The ratio isn't nearly as important as the vote totals. Murphy go 39K. Bob was in the primary with 30k against Murphy in 2001.
Will O'Connor get 40K? Will he get in the 30s? Will he get less than 30K?
I think Weinroth will do a lot better than Carmine. But, that means 15,000 or so. A 4,000 increase would be way better.
Plus, look back to the vote totals in 1998. You'll be shocked.
Next, Elsie. That choice is much like Roddey. Roddey did win county wide. Been there, done that. But you are right. That is the type of person we'd need for 'mayor.' But, we've got Joe Weinroth. Joe is not radical in the slightest. On one hand you'd say it is his strength -- but also a weakness.
Joe didn't rock the boat much in the campaign. He isn't a flashy guy. He didn't do any breakout moves.
This is where the break-out must come -- on council. We'll have Bob O as the mayor with smiles and handshakes. But we'll need the tough-love approach on council. We'll crave balance, and the break-out needs to come in that role, I dare predict.
Hence vote for Gov Rendell (D) for top spot and give more seats to Rs in the state house and state senate.
But, then again, the real challenger may not be Republican. It isn't just a two-party system, here.
The Angry Drunk Bureaucrat: Final Thoughts on the 2005 Pittsburgh General Election
It feels a bit presumptuous to have 'final thoughts' on a topic on which I've barely had first thoughts.
I wrote on his blog:
No, no, no....
I dare say you are close on some of your assumptions, but the final step to close the thought is missing...
The ratio isn't nearly as important as the vote totals. Murphy go 39K. Bob was in the primary with 30k against Murphy in 2001.
Will O'Connor get 40K? Will he get in the 30s? Will he get less than 30K?
I think Weinroth will do a lot better than Carmine. But, that means 15,000 or so. A 4,000 increase would be way better.
Plus, look back to the vote totals in 1998. You'll be shocked.
Next, Elsie. That choice is much like Roddey. Roddey did win county wide. Been there, done that. But you are right. That is the type of person we'd need for 'mayor.' But, we've got Joe Weinroth. Joe is not radical in the slightest. On one hand you'd say it is his strength -- but also a weakness.
Joe didn't rock the boat much in the campaign. He isn't a flashy guy. He didn't do any breakout moves.
This is where the break-out must come -- on council. We'll have Bob O as the mayor with smiles and handshakes. But we'll need the tough-love approach on council. We'll crave balance, and the break-out needs to come in that role, I dare predict.
Hence vote for Gov Rendell (D) for top spot and give more seats to Rs in the state house and state senate.
But, then again, the real challenger may not be Republican. It isn't just a two-party system, here.
2 of 3 voters may stay away. --- People always vote with their feet. Hence Pittsburgh is half of its former self.
My oldest son is 11. Both of my kids have lived their entire life while Tom Murphy served as Mayor of Pittsburgh.
I would have tried to get the Liberty Bridge and Liberty Tunnel renamed for Tom Murphy -- if he had resigned from office before today's election. Won't happen. Oh well. Some of us tried.
I would have tried to get the Liberty Bridge and Liberty Tunnel renamed for Tom Murphy -- if he had resigned from office before today's election. Won't happen. Oh well. Some of us tried.
2 of 3 voters may stay away - PittsburghLIVE.com Although Pittsburgh voters will choose the city's first new mayor in more than a decade, voter turnout in the city and across the county probably won't top 30 percent of nearly 900,000 registered voters in Allegheny County, predicted Mark Wolosik, director of the county's Election Division. That's because many local offices up for grabs this year essentially were decided in the May primary. The ballot contains no major statewide contests.
In the race for a successor to replace three-term Mayor Tom Murphy, Democrat Bob O'Connor, of Squirrel Hill, is a heavy favorite to win over Republican Joe Weinroth, also of Squirrel Hill. Registered Democrats outnumber Republicans in the city by about 5 to 1, and the Democratic primary has decided the mayor's race for seven decades. Other candidates for mayor are Green Party contender Titus North, of Squirrel Hill, independent candidate David Tessitor, of Squirrel Hill, and Socialist Workers candidate Jay M. Ressler, of Lawrenceville.
Eroding the PA Constitution, why we vote "NO" for the PA Judges
In handling the Constitution, the PA Supreme Court gives an absurd level of deference to the legislature. The following wording has appeared in numerous opinions over the past ten years:
"It is well established that a statute is presumed to be constitutional and will not be declared unconstitutional unless it clearly, palpably and plainly violates the Constitution... Therefore, the party challenging the constitutionality of a statute has a heavy burden of persuasion."
And the following sums up who the Court's bias favors:
"Historically, our Court has refrained from inquiring into alleged procedural irregularities in the passage of legislation and has presumed that a statute has been legally enacted."
Most Pennsylvanians have now come to understand that assuming the legislature works within the confines of the Constitution is akin to believing in the tooth fairy. It all sounds nice, but it simply isn't so.
Additionally, the PA Supreme Court has handed down decisions over the past few years which have directly eroded the protections offered by the PA Constitution, including:
Pennsylvania School Boards Association v. Commonwealth Association of School Administrators (PSBA v. CASA, 2002), which allowed the legislature to change the entire meaning of a bill at the last minute, effectively voiding the Single Subject and Three Day protections. Justice Newman and Justice Nigro both concurred.
Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. et al. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al., where the Court upheld Act 71 of 2004 - the slots bill - despite apparent violations of the Original Purpose and Single Subject protections. The decision cited PSBA v. CASA.PAVING THE WAY FOR THE PAY RAISE
Justice Nigro concurred on Act 71, while Justice Newman recused herself due to a conflict of interest apparently arising from ownership of horse racing interests. This decision was handed down on June 22, 2005.
On July 7, 2005 the legislature approved the pay raise. The Governor quickly signed it. The Chief Justice praised it. It was later revealed the Chief Justice of the court helped author the pay raise legislation and actively lobbied for its passage.
Although Chief Justice Cappy publicly praised the pay raise, Justice Newman and Justice Nigro failed to speak out against it. The pay raise violates the Single Subject, Original Purpose, Three Day and Separation of Powers protections. It also violates Article II, Section 8 in two distinct ways.
LIVING LIKE ROYALTY
$85.00 bottles of wine, $300 dinners, On Star systems for taxpayer-funded luxury cars, paid drivers, car washes and golden junkets in luxury suites at both island and mountain resorts are just some of the expenses the Supreme Court Justices have determined are necessary to their duties and have billed taxpayers for.
In an AP story on October 30, Justice Nigro accused those opposed to his retention of making an unfair attack without examining his record. Justice Newman declined to comment.
We believe the record is very clear and points to advocating a "NO" vote on both Newman and Nigro on November 8.
Got Ink: Parents, community groups hope for best from city schools reorganizaton
I'm quoted in an article that starts on the front-page of today's P-G. This coverage is not about election day, but rather about community and schools.
Yes, the RAND DATA should be open for "peer review." It should be defended in academic and community circles. This needs to happen online. I'm sure folks in other cities will want to peek at the logic, numbers and outcomes as well.
Frankly, I'm still waiting for the pointer to go live from the main page of the PPS site for the academic presentation in Power Point. See http://www.pghboe.net. Look for the Nov. 1 presentation. I have a copy of the handout. But, others do not.
Furthermore, these forums that I dream about are much more than a one-way conversation to individuals from the school administration. How about minutes from these meetings? Too often as objections are raised, they ping around the room like B-Bs and are never strung together. How are the pearls pulled together like a necklace? The feedback needs to be collected, harvested, organized. If you are not there in the room, you miss a good deal. Give-and-take isn't being broadcasted, gathered, tested, and weighed with real inspection.
Who is going to hold these "round-table forums?" I don't think that the P-G, RAND, A+ Schools nor the Pgh Public Schools can do it. They each need to be there as well as the unions. But tonight, I'm not sure who can offer the glue to make this work as it should. As you might guess, I'm talking about something more than a new parent hot line phone number. Sure, the phone hot line for parents is great. Call 412 622 7920. But we need some serious advancement to leap over the $47-million gap between expenses and revenues for next year at PPS.
And, we don't need a new gambling task force thingie either. Spare us yet another authority creation for goodness sake.
As to the quote above and the concern about jobs and the expected reassignment of effective principals and teachers, let me be clear. I was asked about the worries that are brewing in the community. I don't have many myself, other than that of a dad with a kid going into 6th grade next year. That's a big time to ring alarm bells. But I feel that there are going to be a lot of worries in the months to come about teacher and administrator positions. Who is going to lead this academy? Who is willing to teach to 5:30 pm? Who is going to go here and help jump start those test scores? Meanwhile, who is going to stay put and work with the influx of others. There are plenty of good teachers. There are a number of great teachers too. But, I wonder about there being enough ambitions in the ranks of the professionals because I sense that they are going to have to put some serious skin in the game.
Frankly, some principals, some naysayers and some who might be burnt out for whatever reason are going to balk. I hope that the uninspired and excuse-makers land in Peters Township by April 2006.
We need to strive for excellence everywhere. And, we'll need to have good energy in all the schools. These are my hopes. These are not my worries. But, for the professionals in the schools, I'm sure these (and other) thoughts are going to enter into unfolding decisions.
I have confidence that the goals being set forth are not intended to undercut schools nor students who are already striving for excellence. But I'm also sure that this thought is going to enter into the discussion now and again in the weeks and months to come.
An interesting trend to the city might materialize. Some of the best teachers from throughout the region could be attracted to new roles in Pittsburgh. The new quest for excellence that is unfolding in the Pgh Public Schools might cause some professional mixing. We'll have new directions and new challenges that have been proven to work in other cities and with some charter schools. This district can be more attractive for existing teachers and be an attraction for top notch teachers elsewhere.
Pgh Public Schools can be known as a great place to make a career for gung-ho teachers and administrators. Let's make it so.
Parents, community groups hope for best from city schools reorganizatonNice article.
Mark Rauterkus, a South Side resident with two children in city schools, said public input should be taken, and responses given, at a series of town hall meetings. He said data that Rand used to analyze school effectiveness should be put online for parents to review.
Mr. Rauterkus said the reorganization will result in some jostling among teachers and administrators for new jobs. He said he's concerned that reassignment of effective principals and teachers could undercut schools already striving for excellence.
Yes, the RAND DATA should be open for "peer review." It should be defended in academic and community circles. This needs to happen online. I'm sure folks in other cities will want to peek at the logic, numbers and outcomes as well.
Frankly, I'm still waiting for the pointer to go live from the main page of the PPS site for the academic presentation in Power Point. See http://www.pghboe.net. Look for the Nov. 1 presentation. I have a copy of the handout. But, others do not.
Furthermore, these forums that I dream about are much more than a one-way conversation to individuals from the school administration. How about minutes from these meetings? Too often as objections are raised, they ping around the room like B-Bs and are never strung together. How are the pearls pulled together like a necklace? The feedback needs to be collected, harvested, organized. If you are not there in the room, you miss a good deal. Give-and-take isn't being broadcasted, gathered, tested, and weighed with real inspection.
Who is going to hold these "round-table forums?" I don't think that the P-G, RAND, A+ Schools nor the Pgh Public Schools can do it. They each need to be there as well as the unions. But tonight, I'm not sure who can offer the glue to make this work as it should. As you might guess, I'm talking about something more than a new parent hot line phone number. Sure, the phone hot line for parents is great. Call 412 622 7920. But we need some serious advancement to leap over the $47-million gap between expenses and revenues for next year at PPS.
And, we don't need a new gambling task force thingie either. Spare us yet another authority creation for goodness sake.
As to the quote above and the concern about jobs and the expected reassignment of effective principals and teachers, let me be clear. I was asked about the worries that are brewing in the community. I don't have many myself, other than that of a dad with a kid going into 6th grade next year. That's a big time to ring alarm bells. But I feel that there are going to be a lot of worries in the months to come about teacher and administrator positions. Who is going to lead this academy? Who is willing to teach to 5:30 pm? Who is going to go here and help jump start those test scores? Meanwhile, who is going to stay put and work with the influx of others. There are plenty of good teachers. There are a number of great teachers too. But, I wonder about there being enough ambitions in the ranks of the professionals because I sense that they are going to have to put some serious skin in the game.
Frankly, some principals, some naysayers and some who might be burnt out for whatever reason are going to balk. I hope that the uninspired and excuse-makers land in Peters Township by April 2006.
We need to strive for excellence everywhere. And, we'll need to have good energy in all the schools. These are my hopes. These are not my worries. But, for the professionals in the schools, I'm sure these (and other) thoughts are going to enter into unfolding decisions.
I have confidence that the goals being set forth are not intended to undercut schools nor students who are already striving for excellence. But I'm also sure that this thought is going to enter into the discussion now and again in the weeks and months to come.
An interesting trend to the city might materialize. Some of the best teachers from throughout the region could be attracted to new roles in Pittsburgh. The new quest for excellence that is unfolding in the Pgh Public Schools might cause some professional mixing. We'll have new directions and new challenges that have been proven to work in other cities and with some charter schools. This district can be more attractive for existing teachers and be an attraction for top notch teachers elsewhere.
Pgh Public Schools can be known as a great place to make a career for gung-ho teachers and administrators. Let's make it so.
Mascots for Beijing Olympic Games to Be Unveiled Soon (photos attached)
Wow. This is impressive.
Beach sign: Keep away from the shark prevention net. (Another excuse to run another of my photos from China.)
Mascots for Beijing Olympic Games to Be Unveiled Soon (photos attached)Does any running mate want to join with me as we set up sidewalk press stands to sell "The First" on the streets of Pittsburgh, shoulder to shoulder with the sales guys pushing The Trib PM?
'The First,' a Beijing-based newspaper dedicated to sports and the Olympic Movement, will launch its 'learn 1,000 English Sentences in 1,000 Days' campaign in collaboration with an agency under the Beijing Municipal Government to promote Beijing residents' enthusiasm to learn foreign languages, especially English. From November 12 till the opening of the Beijing Olympic Games on August 8, 2008, the newspaper will carry one frequently-used English sentence every day on its front page.
Beach sign: Keep away from the shark prevention net. (Another excuse to run another of my photos from China.)
Monday, November 07, 2005
Business Opportunities Weblog | Be Glad You’re an Entrepreneur Now
Nice excuse to publish another photo from China, taken on our most recent trip.Should have showed this photo to Joe Weinroth and the other three (or four) now a part of "The Whack Pack."
Business Opportunities Weblog | Be Glad You’re an Entrepreneur Now: "Be Glad You’re an Entrepreneur Now
Because everyone loves lists, Inc. has put together a list of 75 reasons to be glad you’re an entrepreneur right now. Some of the really good ones:
* Because English is, more than ever, the language of international business. There are more Chinese learning English than Americans speaking it.
Analysis: Closing plan may start new era for city schools
This statement is a little out of context, in my humble opinion.
And, should this plan not work out -- other changes are going to be necessary. I think that this plan has a lot of accountability. And, if certain schools do well while others flounder, again, the ax will swing again.
Great. Let's think again, and again. I don't mean to say we'll back track. Rather, we'll be flexibile from this moment forward and do the dance that needs to be done -- for the sake of the kids that are in the classrooms today.
The biggest fear among the parents is that this generation of kids are going to be lost -- too.
Now that I'm talking about high schools, while the others are yet to start -- here is one bold plan that I'd consider.
Turn Peabody and Westinghouse into single gender high schools. Put the boys in one school and the girls in another school.
With single-gender schools, among other benefits, Central Catholic High School would gain a public school rival. Same too for Oakland Catholic.
Let's talk about this again in 2006 -- after we come to understand the new plan this week for the little ones.
Analysis: Closing plan may start new era for city schools He has said right-sizing is part of a broader vision for overhauling the district. He clearly plans to do this once, do it in a big way and move on.We are going to need to go back and close some more schools in a year or two. The high schools are not being looked at in this round of closings and retoolings. The plan slated for release this week attacks at the elementary and middle school levels. The high schools plan is for another year.
'He doesn't want to go back in a year or two and close more schools,' Mr. Sternberg said. 'He wants this to be what has to be done. Frankly, it needs to be done this way.'
And, should this plan not work out -- other changes are going to be necessary. I think that this plan has a lot of accountability. And, if certain schools do well while others flounder, again, the ax will swing again.
Great. Let's think again, and again. I don't mean to say we'll back track. Rather, we'll be flexibile from this moment forward and do the dance that needs to be done -- for the sake of the kids that are in the classrooms today.
The biggest fear among the parents is that this generation of kids are going to be lost -- too.
Now that I'm talking about high schools, while the others are yet to start -- here is one bold plan that I'd consider.
Turn Peabody and Westinghouse into single gender high schools. Put the boys in one school and the girls in another school.
With single-gender schools, among other benefits, Central Catholic High School would gain a public school rival. Same too for Oakland Catholic.
Let's talk about this again in 2006 -- after we come to understand the new plan this week for the little ones.
Council postpones vote on payments by nonprofits
A big part of the discussion about the nonprofit centered upon the UPMC owned facility on the South Side that is rented, in part to the Pittsburgh Steelers and Pitt for its male-only football team.
This facility is what drove me to get involved in politics. The planning was goofy to me then, as a newbie in this realm. The promises that were made have been broken. It wasn't square from the get-go.
UPMC, a nonprofit, purchased the prime riverfront land from the URA (city owned Urban Redevelopment Authority). The land came at a bargain price. These 30 acres were sold, and deals were struck, so that the Steelers could have a place to practice. A practice field on the North Side was taken with the building of Heinz Field.
A PLIOT -- Payment In Lieu of Taxes -- was struck. Or, so the joke was told.
This happened years ago. Back then I was not okay with the sale of the land. I was not happy with the design of the dwarf football fields. I was not okay with the pledge of community access. I was not happy to see the loss of tax incomes by selling the land to a nonprofit owner. I objected. I spoke up. My protest, and that of some others as well, got the new owners, UPMC, to dump some additional money back into the community. I call that 'hush money.' The $6,000 grant offer from Jerry D was laughed at and the amount went up ten-fold from one meeting to the next. He is long gone from UPMC's administration. I'm still here. I'm still with a vivid memory of the broken promises too.
Now at the city council meeting, today, the deal got twisted again. The money that UPMC is paying for the land is still part of the sales agreement. Say what? That needs to be put on tape. But then again, the weirdness came from Sala Udin, a URA Board member and long-time 'yes man' to Mayor Murphy. Sala's time on council is ending shortly.
Sala's statements need to be researched. If nothing else, that deal needs to be unlocked and put in the open -- finally.
Mayor Murphy was happy to give away land to nonprofits. Then he is quick to cry the blues because so much land is owned by the nonprofits.
I've been talking about the crisis of nonprofit land ownership for years -- and that was the reason I jumped into politics.
Now there are others who are finally starting to 'think again.'
This facility is what drove me to get involved in politics. The planning was goofy to me then, as a newbie in this realm. The promises that were made have been broken. It wasn't square from the get-go.
UPMC, a nonprofit, purchased the prime riverfront land from the URA (city owned Urban Redevelopment Authority). The land came at a bargain price. These 30 acres were sold, and deals were struck, so that the Steelers could have a place to practice. A practice field on the North Side was taken with the building of Heinz Field.
A PLIOT -- Payment In Lieu of Taxes -- was struck. Or, so the joke was told.
This happened years ago. Back then I was not okay with the sale of the land. I was not happy with the design of the dwarf football fields. I was not okay with the pledge of community access. I was not happy to see the loss of tax incomes by selling the land to a nonprofit owner. I objected. I spoke up. My protest, and that of some others as well, got the new owners, UPMC, to dump some additional money back into the community. I call that 'hush money.' The $6,000 grant offer from Jerry D was laughed at and the amount went up ten-fold from one meeting to the next. He is long gone from UPMC's administration. I'm still here. I'm still with a vivid memory of the broken promises too.
Now at the city council meeting, today, the deal got twisted again. The money that UPMC is paying for the land is still part of the sales agreement. Say what? That needs to be put on tape. But then again, the weirdness came from Sala Udin, a URA Board member and long-time 'yes man' to Mayor Murphy. Sala's time on council is ending shortly.
Sala's statements need to be researched. If nothing else, that deal needs to be unlocked and put in the open -- finally.
Council postpones vote on payments by nonprofits Mr. Shields called that 'circular logic' and said the obvious solution would be the release to council of all existing agreements with nonprofit organizations. 'What's the rush to this?' he said of the contract vote. 'The agreement before us is incomplete.'One long-term solution to these nonprofit struggles should be the construction of a land-expansion-moratorium for the whole nonprofit community. We need to do a complete inventory of land. This needs to be cataloged by year in square foot. And, the trend has to be put in reverse.
Mayor Murphy was happy to give away land to nonprofits. Then he is quick to cry the blues because so much land is owned by the nonprofits.
I've been talking about the crisis of nonprofit land ownership for years -- and that was the reason I jumped into politics.
Now there are others who are finally starting to 'think again.'
Lifting the curtain on the PPS plans
Superintendent Mark Roosevelt is calling out an invite for parents to attend a Press Briefing at 2 pm on Wednesday afternoon, November 9, 2005. He will announce the Plan to Right-Size the Pittsburgh Public Schools.
Go to Conference Room A, Pittsburgh Board to Education Building, 341 S. Bellefield Avenue, Oakland.
Get the outline of the educational enhancements and resource realignment for the 2006-2007 school year.
Go to Conference Room A, Pittsburgh Board to Education Building, 341 S. Bellefield Avenue, Oakland.
Get the outline of the educational enhancements and resource realignment for the 2006-2007 school year.
Pittsburgh City Council members jockey for presidency
Classic.
The vote to remain relevant happened when the overlords were invited into this city. The last relevant vote council took was to give up its power and accept the oversight boards. The reason that the overlords were called to the city is because city council and the mayor miss-managed public funds. The overlords were called to Pittsburgh for good reason.
The overlords are goiong to need to see good reason to depart and it is the job of city council to prove that it is relevant again. That is my call. I'll be running for city council to prove that council is again a relevant voice -- and it is necessary for the city to thrive again.
I want to help push the oversight boards out of town by doing a great job with the budget and democracy. We need to fix ourselves. We need to heal the city -- in acts, deeds and determined leadership from all elements of the city's population and political systems.
Pittsburgh City Council members jockey for presidency 'Council should not be a department of the new administration,' said Mr. Peduto. 'We need to have as much independence as the [fiscal overseers] if we're going to remain a relevant voice.'Sorry. City Council has become less and less meaningful -- thanks to pushes from Peduto. Peduto wanted the overlords. Now Peduto wants to be with as much independence as the overlords. Peduto wants to be equal with the overloards.
The vote to remain relevant happened when the overlords were invited into this city. The last relevant vote council took was to give up its power and accept the oversight boards. The reason that the overlords were called to the city is because city council and the mayor miss-managed public funds. The overlords were called to Pittsburgh for good reason.
The overlords are goiong to need to see good reason to depart and it is the job of city council to prove that it is relevant again. That is my call. I'll be running for city council to prove that council is again a relevant voice -- and it is necessary for the city to thrive again.
I want to help push the oversight boards out of town by doing a great job with the budget and democracy. We need to fix ourselves. We need to heal the city -- in acts, deeds and determined leadership from all elements of the city's population and political systems.
Pgh School Shake-up Hits this week -- starting with crossing guards again
Our schools are in trouble. And, again, we find that the powers that be are dinking over crossing guards. Frustration mounts.
Doug Shields on City Council got to serve as a crossing guard for an hour recently. He lived to talk about it today at the council meeting.
This was an issue last year and the year before. It is still a big issue in the budget for 2006. The oversight board wants to have a meeting with the city and schools to shift the cost of the crossing guards onto the backs of the school budget. And, city council members want to get the city, county and school leaders to meet to talk about the crossing guards too.
Wrong.
The city has had a duty to pay for crossing guards. Mayor Murphy messed up, as usual. Now, you got to go back and fix up his mess.
School crossing guards should be paid for by the city. Those who are in charge of doing the budget, city council, should fix the problem that lingers.
The crossing guards work the streets that go before city, charter, private and cathlolic schools. The streets are for drivers, walkers, bikers, bus riders and our kids. This is the realm of POLICE and public safety.
I want my school budget to pay for reading coaches, math teachers and algebra tutors. Our school system needs to teach kids -- not make sure that neighborhoods are safe. The city council and mayor need to make sure the neighborhoods are safe.
The oversight board wants to take money away from the schools to pay for crossing guards. Meanwhile, the school performance is so bad -- we run the risk of the entire school district being taken over by the state. There is a bad idea in the middle of becoming real. Rob the school district, over and over again, then take it over for failing to meet state standards. Pay more later when the state takes over all the schools of the district.
These guys are trying to kill the schools, and in turn the city. And, the city council members are letting this happen.
Doug Shields on City Council got to serve as a crossing guard for an hour recently. He lived to talk about it today at the council meeting.
This was an issue last year and the year before. It is still a big issue in the budget for 2006. The oversight board wants to have a meeting with the city and schools to shift the cost of the crossing guards onto the backs of the school budget. And, city council members want to get the city, county and school leaders to meet to talk about the crossing guards too.
Wrong.
The city has had a duty to pay for crossing guards. Mayor Murphy messed up, as usual. Now, you got to go back and fix up his mess.
School crossing guards should be paid for by the city. Those who are in charge of doing the budget, city council, should fix the problem that lingers.
The crossing guards work the streets that go before city, charter, private and cathlolic schools. The streets are for drivers, walkers, bikers, bus riders and our kids. This is the realm of POLICE and public safety.
I want my school budget to pay for reading coaches, math teachers and algebra tutors. Our school system needs to teach kids -- not make sure that neighborhoods are safe. The city council and mayor need to make sure the neighborhoods are safe.
The oversight board wants to take money away from the schools to pay for crossing guards. Meanwhile, the school performance is so bad -- we run the risk of the entire school district being taken over by the state. There is a bad idea in the middle of becoming real. Rob the school district, over and over again, then take it over for failing to meet state standards. Pay more later when the state takes over all the schools of the district.
These guys are trying to kill the schools, and in turn the city. And, the city council members are letting this happen.
ELECTION DAY event: KISS YOUR LEVERS GOODBYE PARTY!
Come pull a lever on one of our wonderful walking lever machines and get a Hersey's kiss as we KISS OUR LEVERS IN ALLEGHENY COUNTY "GOODBYE".
TOMORROW, Election Day, 11/8/2005
TIMEs: 11 AM to 1PM and 3 PM to 6 PM
LOCATION: Outside the Polling Station on the sidewalk (And maybe across the street at the bus stop) Forbes Avenue side of the Jewish Community Center (JCC) at 5738 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15217
This will be the last time Pittsburghers vote on the venerable lever machines after decades of service. What will replace them? We hope it will be a voting machine with a voter-verified paper audit trail (V-VPAT) with a routine audit.
Our county will be purchasing new machines in the next months. HB2000/SB977 provide electronic voting machines with V-VPATs and routine audits in our elections in PA. We will be handing out educational literature on how HB2000 will safeguard our elections in PA.
Thanks for helping to safeguard the integrity of our elections in Pennsylvania.
Cheers, Richard King
PS - Don't miss the special county council hearing on our county voting machine purchases, November 17th. Call for more details!
Richard King, Ph.D. (412) 400-3773, kinggaines@comcast.net,
www.PA-VerifiedVoting.org,
www.verifiedvoting.org
Links for Pennsylvania HB2000/SB977:
Voter Verified Paper Records with Routine Audits
www.PA-VerifiedVoting.org (locate&email your legislators)
www.VotePA.us (Listserve for voting reform activists)
democracyforberks.com/countmyvote (List of co-sponsors)
http://www.coalitionforvotingintegrity.org/
http://www.congressweb.com/cweb4/index.cfm?orgcode=VTUSA&hotissue=2
Abercrombie & Fitch to pull line of T-shirts
Abercrombie & Fitch to pull line of T-shirts Saturday, November 05, 2005
By Monica Haynes and Moustafa Ayad, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Retail giant Abercrombie & Fitch, bowing to increasing national pressure started by a local girls group, has agreed to stop selling several controversial T-shirts.
Splendid singing, music and message -- with a recent victory!
The hardest element of this posting is trying to figure out who should get top billing. All were excellent.
Emma Blackman-Mathis join with Emma's Revolution to bask in the glory of the recent victory.
Pgh's Emma and DC-based Emma's Revolution hooked up in Friendship. Check out the t-shirts. (Click image for larger view.)
Girlcott co-organizer, Emma, (16-year old from Pittsburgh) back from major network appearances, and triumph with A&F's decision to yank the t-shirt line. (keep reading)
Musical power.
Anne Feeney stages another great event.
Back to the t-shirt story:
On November 2, 2005, the news was about free PR for A&F and the girls. Since then, the A&F changed its tune. The t-shirts are gone.
Emma Blackman-Mathis join with Emma's Revolution to bask in the glory of the recent victory.
Pgh's Emma and DC-based Emma's Revolution hooked up in Friendship. Check out the t-shirts. (Click image for larger view.) Girlcott co-organizer, Emma, (16-year old from Pittsburgh) back from major network appearances, and triumph with A&F's decision to yank the t-shirt line. (keep reading)
Musical power.In May 2002, the song, (my favorite) "Swimming to the Other Side" was featured on NPR's All Things Considered. In the interview, Pete Seeger said, "The powers that be can control the media (but) it's hard to stop a good song . . . Pat's songs will be sung well into the 22nd century." The tremendous and unprecedented response by NPR listeners made Emma's Revolution CD, "Hands," the #1 seller on Amazon.com for three days following.
Pat Humphries and Sandy Opatow, (neither named Emma -- but both want to dance at the revolution) were in the process of moving to the Washington DC area from New York City on September 11, 2001. Since then, they have been performing at concerts, teach-ins and rallies. At one event as Gulf War II began, the singers/songwriters lead 10,000 people in an outdoor concert in NYC in the singing of their song "Peace, Salaam, Shalom." That inspiring event, less than a month after September 11th, was requested and repeated at an all-night peace vigil in NYC on the first 9-11 anniversary.
"Democracy Now!" with Amy Goodman plays a number of their songs. Rhythms Magazine called the "Hands" CD a "powerful and energetic album. . . one of the best of 2001." Sheet music in PDF format of the peace song is online.
Anne Feeney stages another great event.Back to the t-shirt story:
On November 2, 2005, the news was about free PR for A&F and the girls. Since then, the A&F changed its tune. The t-shirts are gone.
Newsday.com: Student 'girlcott' protests Abercrombie t-shirts
With a few words on their T-shirts, Abercrombie & Fitch lets young women send a message: 'Who needs a brain when you have these?'
A group of female high school students have a message for A&F: Stop degrading us.
The Allegheny County (Pa.) Girls have started a boycott -- or girlcott, as they're calling it -- of the retailer. The campaign, conceived three weeks ago during the group's monthly meeting, went national on NBC's "Today" show. (Emma was on all the major networks: CNN, Fox, etc.)
"We're telling [girls] to think about the fact that they're being degraded," Emma Blackman-Mathis, the 16-year-old co-chair of the group. "We're all going to come together in this one effort to fight this message that we're getting from pop culture."Abercrombie has been a lightning rod for criticism:"Our clothing appeals to a wide variety of customers. These particular T-shirts have been very popular among adult women to whom they are marketed," a company spokesman said in a statement.In 2003, a catalog containing photos of topless women and bare-bottomed men provoked so much outrage that the company pulled the publication. Last year, after the U.S. Olympic gymnastics team failed to win a gold medal, the company sold T-shirts with the phrase "L is for loser" next to a picture of a gymnast on the rings. Those shirts were pulled from the racks after USA Gymastics called for a boycott. While Abercrombie backed down in those cases, it show no signs of doing so this time. (Ha! A&F did back down this time. The young women from Allegheny County won.)
News of the girlcott hadn't reached Tawana Clark, 20, who was applying for a job at the Abercrombie & Fitch store in Water Tower Place on Tuesday. But she doesn't think the protest will work.
"I think it's only older people that have a problem with it," she said. "Teenagers don't have a problem with it." (Ha, ha, ha!)
Clark sees the shirts as funny, not offensive. "It's not to be taken seriously," she said. (Say what?)
The aim of the girlcott is to convince people that the T-shirts are offensive, but young people don't care if they are, according to David Krafft, senior vice president of Chicago-based Graziano, Krafft and Zale Advertising.
"You figure they're appealing to a younger audience demographic and (young people) are going to want go for brands that are more cutting edge, or viewed as more cutting edge," Krafft said. "So it's just going to be a benefit anyway to Abercrombie & Fitch."
The attention from this boycott is likely to help Abercrombie's image, and its audience will be attracted to the controversy, said Steve Bassill, president of Libertyville-based QDI strategies, a marketing consulting firm. (WRONG!)
"That's been their whole strategy, isn't it, to be radical?" Bassill asked. "I think that's what we've seen for quite a while from them."
Krafft says the "Today" show appearance was tantamount to free advertising.
According to Chicago-based media company Starcom USA, a 30-second commercial on "Today" costs approximately $58,000.
The girlcott girls were on for several minutes. The girlcott almost is "playing into their hands," Bassill said.
Heather Arnett, adviser for the girls' group, said it doesn't matter if Abercrombie gets free advertising. They're already a giant as far as she's concerned. What matters is empowering young women, she said, who in turn serve as examples to other young women.
"A week ago, Katie Couric knew who Abercrombie & Fitch was, but she didn't know who Emma Blackman-Mathis was," Arnett said. "A bunch of teenage girls are being interviewed by national media about what they think. And that is the news."
Blackman-Mathis admits that, at first glance, the T-shirts are a little funny.
But the more she looked at them, the less amusing they were. She's still stunned to have appeared on national TV and is hopeful the message will reach young girls.
"Worst-case scenario, I just want girls to at least think about everything that they buy," Blackman-Mathis said. "Think about the message that it conveys to themselves and other people when they wear it."
Her best-case scenario?
"They would stand up and say something for themselves and for girls."
Sunday, November 06, 2005
Fantastic prime-time political TV -- West Wing's debate
Tonights TV show, West Wing, delivered a wonderful bit of drama. Plus, I think the presentation by the fictional characters made a top-shelf contrast between two points of view.
It was so good, I don't even miss the lack of a WQED debate on the mayor's race. Talk about contrasts.
Bob O'Connor now has a fresh excuse for not going onto any TV debate stage. Bob would look like hell next to the prime time actors in West Wing.
It was so good, I don't even miss the lack of a WQED debate on the mayor's race. Talk about contrasts.
Bob O'Connor now has a fresh excuse for not going onto any TV debate stage. Bob would look like hell next to the prime time actors in West Wing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
